β-Amyloid plaques and tau-containing neurofibrillary tangles are the two neuropathological hallmarks of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and are thought to play crucial roles in a neurodegenerative cascade leading to dementia. Both lesions can now be visualized in vivo using positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracers, opening new opportunities to study disease mechanisms and improve patients’ diagnostic and prognostic evaluation. In a group of 32 patients at early symptomatic AD stages, we tested whether β-amyloid and tau-PET could predict subsequent brain atrophy measured using longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging acquired at the time of PET and 15 months later. Quantitative analyses showed that the global intensity of tau-PET, but not β-amyloid–PET, signal predicted the rate of subsequent atrophy, independent of baseline cortical thickness. Additional investigations demonstrated that the specific distribution of tau-PET signal was a strong indicator of the topography of future atrophy at the single patient level and that the relationship between baseline tau-PET and subsequent atrophy was particularly strong in younger patients. These data support disease models in which tau pathology is a major driver of local neurodegeneration and highlight the relevance of tau-PET as a precision medicine tool to help predict individual patient’s progression and design future clinical trials.
BackgroundThe tau positron emission tomography (PET) ligand 18F-flortaucipir binds to paired helical filaments of tau in aging and Alzheimer’s disease (AD), but its utility in detecting tau aggregates in frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is uncertain.MethodsWe performed 18F-flortaucipir imaging in patients with the FTD syndromes (n = 45): nonfluent variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) (n = 11), corticobasal syndrome (CBS) (n = 10), behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) (n = 10), semantic variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA) (n = 2) and FTD associated pathogenic genetic mutations microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) (n = 6), chromosome 9 open reading frame 72 (C9ORF72) (n = 5), and progranulin (GRN) (n = 1). All patients underwent MRI and β-amyloid biomarker testing via 11C-PiB or cerebrospinal fluid. 18F-flortaucipir uptake in patients was compared to 53 β-amyloid negative normal controls using voxelwise and pre-specified region of interest approaches.ResultsOn qualitative assessment, patients with nfvPPA showed elevated 18F-flortacupir binding in the left greater than right inferior frontal gyrus. Patients with CBS showed elevated binding in frontal white matter, with higher cortical gray matter uptake in a subset of β-amyloid-positive patients. Five of ten patients with sporadic bvFTD demonstrated increased frontotemporal binding. MAPT mutation carriers had elevated 18F-flortaucipir retention primarily, but not exclusively, in mutations with Alzheimer’s-like neurofibrillary tangles. However, tracer retention was also seen in patients with svPPA, and the mutations C9ORF72, GRN predicted to have TDP-43 pathology. Quantitative region-of-interest differences between patients and controls were seen only in inferior frontal gyrus in nfvPPA and left insula and bilateral temporal poles in MAPT carriers. No significant regional differences were found in CBS or sporadic bvFTD. Two patients underwent postmortem neuropathological examination. A patient with C9ORF72, TDP-43-type B pathology, and incidental co-pathology of scattered neurofibrillary tangles in the middle frontal, inferior temporal gyrus showed corresponding mild 18F-flortaucipir retention without additional uptake matching the widespread TDP-43 type B pathology. A patient with sporadic bvFTD demonstrated punctate inferior temporal and hippocampus tracer retention, corresponding to the area of severe argyrophilic grain disease pathology.Conclusions18F-flortaucipir in patients with FTD and predicted tauopathy or TDP-43 pathology demonstrated limited sensitivity and specificity. Further postmortem pathological confirmation and development of FTD tau-specific ligands are needed.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0470-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
This study provides Class III evidence that, in a clinical sample of patients with a variety of suspected neurodegenerative diseases, both CSF p-tau and [F]AV1451 distinguish AD from non-AD conditions.
ObjectiveTo assess whether Alzheimer disease (AD) clinical presentation and APOE4 relate to the burden and topography of β-amyloid and tau pathologies using in vivo PET imaging.MethodsWe studied 119 β-amyloid-positive symptomatic patients aged 48–95 years, including 29 patients with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA) and 21 with Posterior Cortical Atrophy (PCA). PIB- (β-amyloid) and Flortaucipir (tau)-PET standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) images were created. General linear models assessed relationships between demographic/clinical variables (phenotype, age), APOE4, and PET (including global cortical and voxelwise SUVR values) while controlling for disease severity using the clinical dementia rating scale sum of boxes.ResultsPIB-PET binding showed a widespread cortical distribution with subtle differences across phenotypes and was unrelated to demographic/clinical variables or APOE4. Flortaucipir-PET was commonly elevated in temporo-parietal regions, but showed marked phenotype-associated differences, with higher binding observed in occipito-parietal areas for PCA, in left temporal and inferior frontal for lvPPA, and in medial temporal areas for other patients with AD. Cortical Flortaucipir-PET binding was higher in younger patients across phenotypes (r = −0.63, 95%CI [−0.72, −0.50)]), especially in parietal and dorsal prefrontal cortices. The presence of APOE4 was associated with a focal medial temporal Flortaucipir-SUVR increase, controlling for all other variables (entorhinal: + 0.310 SUVR 95%CI [0.091, 0.530]).ConclusionsClinical phenotypes are associated with differential patterns of tau but not amyloid pathology. Older age and APOE4 are not only risk factors for AD but also seem to affect disease expression by promoting a more MTL-predominant pattern of tau pathology.
HighlightsElevated tau PET signal was seen in a subset of patients at risk for CTE.Highest tracer retention was found in patients with positive amyloid PET.Tau PET, FDG and MRI showed converging abnormalities in frontotemporal regions.
Complex shapes can be identified (named) when only the outer boundary of the shape is represented by discrete dots and with the dots being displayed for a duration lasting only a few microseconds (μs). This line of work is extended here to include recognition of letters with 10 μs flashes as a means to study visible persistence and information persistence. The first two studies were designed to assess visible persistence. Models were derived that quantified how recognition changed as a function of flash intensity. Then each letter was displayed twice, each at a near-threshold level of intensity and varying the interval between flashes. The second flash was able to boost the influence of the first flash for about 100 ms. This corresponds to the duration that a brief flash will remain visible, so these conditions likely were producing visible persistence. Information persistence was studied by manipulating dot density of the letter patterns. Recognition declined as the density of dots in each letter pattern was reduced. When two complimentary low-density samples were flashed, there was summation of their influence that declined to an asymptote in about 200 ms, and then remained above the one-flash control out to the maximum test interval of 1 s. The summation of high-salience, low-density dot patterns over such a long interval likely reflects both iconic memory persistence and access to working memory.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.