Emergency general surgery utilization and disparities during COVID-19: an interrupted time-series analysis

Abstract

ObjectiveWe aimed to compare general surgery emergency (GSE) volume, demographics and disease severity before and during COVID-19.BackgroundPresentations to the emergency department (ED) for GSEs fell during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Barriers to accessing care may be heightened, especially for vulnerable populations, and patients delaying care raises public health concerns.MethodsWe included adult patients with ED presentations for potential GSEs at a single quaternary-care hospital from January 2018 to August 2020. To compare GSE volumes in total and by subgroup, an interrupted time-series analysis was performed using the March shelter-in-place order as the start of the COVID-19 period. Bivariate analysis was used to compare demographics and disease severity.Results3255 patients (28/week) presented with potential GSEs before COVID-19, while 546 (23/week) presented during COVID-19. When shelter-in-place started, presentations fell by 8.7/week (31%) from the previous week (p<0.001), driven by decreases in peritonitis (β=−2.76, p=0.017) and gallbladder disease (β=−2.91, p=0.016). During COVID-19, patients were younger (54 vs 57, p=0.001), more often privately insured (44% vs 38%, p=0.044), and fewer required interpreters (12% vs 15%, p<0.001). Fewer patients presented with sepsis during the pandemic (15% vs 20%, p=0.009) and the average severity of illness decreased (p<0.001). Length of stay was shorter during the COVID-19 period (3.91 vs 5.50 days, p<0.001).ConclusionsGSE volumes and severity fell during the pandemic. Patients presenting during the pandemic were less likely to be elderly, publicly insured and have limited English proficiency, potentially exacerbating underlying health disparities and highlighting the need to improve care access for these patients.Level of evidenceIII.

Impact of the COVID‐19 Pandemic on Pediatric Surgical Volume in Four Low‐ and Middle‐Income Country Hospitals: Insights from an Interrupted Time Series Analysis

“…On the other hand, although emergency surgical volume similarly decreased, it has continued to decrease during the post-COVID period. This finding may be consistent with those in other studies where hospitals worldwide that experienced decreases in emergent surgeries during the pandemic [ 32 – 37 ]. Again, we believe this may be due to sicker patients avoiding medical care or facing insurmountable challenges in accessing care during the pandemic, but more research is needed.…”

Emergencies do not shut down during a pandemic: COVID pandemic impact on Acute Care Surgery volume and mortality at a level I trauma center

“…These are similar to findings of Dick et al who saw a 58% decrease in EGS admission but increased operative rate (19–42%), as well as increased presentation severity. 20 While several other studies saw decreased operative rates during the pandemic, 21 , 22 , 23 , 26 , 42 this study is one of the first to demonstrate a similar rate of operative EGS before and during the COVID Pandemic. Additionally, severity of presentation was similar with equivalent ED GCS, WBC, and initial lactate.…”

A retrospective single-institution review of the impact of COVID-19 on severity of biliary disease

“…Early studies to characterize the presentation, severity, and outcomes in the surgical management of biliary disease during the pandemic have shown conflicting results. 9 , 10 , 11 While Valles et al demonstrated decreased cholecystitis admissions without increased disease severity during the pandemic, 9 another study by Murphy et al identified increases in acute calculous cholecystitis presentation. 10 …”