Background Two decades ago, hypotensive trauma patients requiring emergent laparotomy had a 40% mortality. In the interim, multiple interventions to decrease hemorrhage-related mortality have been implemented but few have any documented evidence of change in outcomes for patients requiring emergent laparotomy. The purpose of this study was to determine current mortality rates for patients undergoing emergent trauma laparotomy. Methods A retrospective cohort of all adult, emergent trauma laparotomies performed in 2012–2013 at 12 Level I trauma centers was reviewed. Emergent trauma laparotomy was defined as emergency department (ED) admission to surgical start time in ≤90 minutes. Hypotension was defined as arrival ED systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≤90 mmHg. Cause and time to death was also determined. Continuous data are presented as median [IQR]. Results 1,706 patients underwent emergent trauma laparotomy. The cohort was predominately young (31 years [24, 45]), male (84%), sustained blunt trauma (67%), and with moderate injuries (ISS 19 [10, 33]). The time in ED was 24 minutes [14, 39] and time from ED admission to surgical start was 42 minutes [30, 61]. The most common procedures were enterectomy (23%), hepatorrhaphy (20%), enterorrhaphy (16%), and splenectomy (16%). Damage control laparotomy was utilized in 38% of all patients and 62% of hypotensive patients. The Injury Severity Score for the entire cohort was 19 (IQR 10, 33) and 29 (IQR 18, 41) for the hypotensive group. Mortality for the entire cohort was 21% with 60% of deaths due to hemorrhage. Mortality in the hypotensive group was 46%, with 65% of deaths due to hemorrhage. Conclusion Overall mortality rate of a trauma laparotomy is substantial (21%) with hemorrhage accounting for 60% of the deaths. The mortality rate for hypotensive patients (46%) appears unchanged over the last two decades and is even more concerning, with almost half of patients presenting with a SBP ≤ 90 mmHg dying. Level of Evidence Level III (retrospective epidemiologcal study with up to two negative criteria)

Rationale: Postsepsis care recommendations target specific deficits experienced by sepsis survivors in elements such as optimization of medications, screening for functional impairments, monitoring for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and consideration of palliative care. However, few data are available regarding the application of these elements in clinical practice.Objectives: To quantify the delivery of postsepsis care for patients discharged after hospital admission for sepsis and evaluate the association between receipt of postsepsis care elements and reduced mortality and hospital readmission within 90 days.Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review of a random sample of patients who were discharged alive after an admission for sepsis (identified from International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision discharge codes) at 10 hospitals during 2017. We used a structured chart abstraction to determine whether four elements of postsepsis care were provided within 90 days of hospital discharge, per expert recommendations. We used multivariable logistic regression to evaluate the association between receipt of care elements and 90-day hospital readmission and mortality, adjusted for age, comorbidity, length of stay, and discharge disposition.Results: Among 189 sepsis survivors, 117 (62%) had medications optimized, 123 (65%) had screening for functional or mental health impairments, 86 (46%) were monitored for common and preventable causes of health deterioration, and 110 (58%) had care alignment processes documented (i.e., assessed for palliative care or goals of care). Only 20 (11%) received all four care elements within 90 days. Within 90 days of discharge, 66 (35%) patients were readmitted and 33 (17%) died (total patients readmitted or died, n = 82). Receipt of two (odds ratio [OR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.10-0.69) or more (three OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.72; four OR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.50) care elements was associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality compared with zero or one element documented. Optimization of medications (no medication errors vs. one or more errors; OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21-0.92), documented functional or mental health assessments (physical function plus swallowing/mental health assessments vs. no assessments; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.05-0.40), and documented goals of care or palliative care screening (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.25-1.05; not statistically significant) were associated with lower odds of 90-day readmission or 90-day mortality. Conclusions:In this retrospective cohort study of data from a single health system, we found variable delivery of recommended postsepsis care elements that were associated with reduced morbidity and mortality after hospitalization for sepsis. Implementation strategies to efficiently overcome barriers to adopting recommended postsepsis care may help improve outcomes for sepsis survivors.

The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is significantly elevated in a Hispanic community in Bexar County, Texas. Chronic exposure to dietary aflatoxins (AFs) is a major risk factor for HCC; increased risk has been linked to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) coexposure and hepatitis virus infection. The aims of this study were to assess AF and PAH exposures, investigate dietary factors that may contribute to increased AF exposure, and determine the prevalence of hepatitis virus infection in Bexar Co. Blood and urine samples were collected from 184 volunteers for biomarker analyses and hepatitis screening. Serum AFB 1 -lysine adduct, urinary AFM 1 and 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) levels were measured using high-performance liquid chromatography. The average AFB 1 -lysine adduct level detected in 20.6% of serums was 3.84 ± 3.11 pg/mg albumin (range 1.01-16.57 pg/mg). AFM 1 was detected in 11.7% of urines, averaging 223.85 ± 250.56 pg/mg creatinine (range 1.89-935.49 pg/mg). AFM 1 detection was associated with increased consumption of corn tortillas (p = 0.009), nuts (p = 0.033) and rice (p = 0.037). A significant difference was observed between mean 1-OHP values of non-smokers (0.07 ± 0.13) and smokers (0.80 ± 0.68) μmol/mol creatinine (p < 0.01). A high hepatitis C virus positivity rate (7.1%) was observed. Findings suggest that the incidence and level of AF and PAH exposure was less than that observed in a high-risk population; however, participants consuming higher amounts of foods prone to AF contamination may be more vulnerable to exposure and interactions with other environmental/biological factors (i.e., HCV).

No abstract

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to determine whether the implementation of a dedicated multiprofessional acute trauma health care (mPATH) team would decrease length of stay without adversely impacting outcomes of patients with severe traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries. The mPATH team was comprised of a physical, occupational, speech, and respiratory therapist, nurse navigator, social worker, advanced care provider, and physician who performed rounds on the subset of trauma patients with these injuries from the intensive care unit to discharge. METHODS Following the formation and implementation of the mPATH team at our Level I trauma center, a retrospective cohort study was performed comparing patients in the year immediately prior to the introduction of the mPATH team (n = 60) to those in the first full year following implementation (n = 70). Demographics were collected for both groups. Inclusion criteria were Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 8 on postinjury Day 2, all paraplegic and quadriplegic patients, and patients older than 55 years with central cord syndrome who underwent tracheostomy. The primary endpoint was length of stay; secondary endpoints were time to tracheostomy, days to evaluation by occupational, physical, and speech therapy, 30-day readmission, and 30-day mortality. RESULTS The median time to evaluation by occupational, physical, and speech therapy was universally decreased. Injury Severity Score was 27 in both cohorts. Time to tracheostomy and length of stay were both decreased. Thirty-day readmission and mortality rates remained unchanged. A cost savings of US $11,238 per index hospitalization was observed. CONCLUSION In the year following the initiation of the mPATH team, we observed earlier time to occupational, physical, and speech therapist evaluation, decreased length of stay, and cost savings in severe traumatic brain and spinal cord injury patients requiring tracheostomy compared with our historical control. These benefits were observed without adversely impacting 30-day readmission or mortality. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic/care management, Level III.

No abstract

BACKGROUND Fatality rates following penetrating traumatic brain injury (pTBI) are extremely high and survivors are often left with significant disability. Infection following pTBI is associated with worse morbidity. The modern rates of central nervous system infections (INF) in civilian survivors are unknown. This study sought to determine the rate of and risk factors for INF following pTBI and to determine the impact of antibiotic prophylaxis. METHODS Seventeen institutions submitted adult patients with pTBI and survival of more than 72 hours from 2006 to 2016. Patients were stratified by the presence or absence of infection and the use or omission of prophylactic antibiotics. Study was powered at 85% to detect a difference in infection rate of 5%. Primary endpoint was the impact of prophylactic antibiotics on INF. Mantel-Haenszel χ2 and Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests were used to compare categorical and nonparametric variables. Significance greater than p = 0.2 was included in a logistic regression adjusted for center. RESULTS Seven hundred sixty-three patients with pTBI were identified over 11 years. 7% (n = 51) of patients developed an INF. Sixty-six percent of INF patients received prophylactic antibiotics. Sixty-two percent of all patients received one dose or greater of prophylactic antibiotics and 50% of patients received extended antibiotics. Degree of dural penetration did not appear to impact the incidence of INF (p = 0.8) nor did trajectory through the oropharynx (p = 0.18). Controlling for other variables, there was no statistically significant difference in INF with the use of prophylactic antibiotics (p = 0.5). Infection was higher in patients with intracerebral pressure monitors (4% vs. 12%; p = <0.001) and in patients with surgical intervention (10% vs. 3%; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION There is no reduction in INF with prophylactic antibiotics in pTBI. Surgical intervention and invasive intracerebral pressure monitoring appear to be risk factors for INF regardless of prophylactic use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, level IV.

Traumatic intraperitoneal bladder rupture (IBR) requires surgical repair. Traditionally performed via laparotomy, experience with laparoscopic bladder repair (LBR) after blunt trauma is limited. Benefits of laparoscopy include decreased length of stay (LOS), less pain, early return to work, fewer adhesions, and lower risk of incisional hernia. The aim of this series is to demonstrate the potential superiority of LBR in select trauma patients. This is a retrospective review performed of all IBR patients from 2008 to 2016. Demographics, clinical management, outcomes, and follow-up were compared between LBR and open bladder repair (OBR) patients. Twenty patients underwent OBR, and seven underwent LBR. There was no significant difference in gender, age, or Injury Severity Score. There were no deaths or reoperations in either group. Average hospital length of stay and ICU days were similar between groups. There was one patient with UTI and one with readmission in each group. There were two incisional hernias and two bowel obstructions in the OBR group, with one patient requiring operative intervention. No such complications occurred in the LBR group. LBR for traumatic IBR can be safely performed in select patients, even in those with multiple extra-abdominal injuries.