2010
DOI: 10.3109/15563650903397234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Emergency department use after pediatric pharmaceutical ingestion: comparison of two national databases

Abstract: These results are close suggesting that the actual number is near these numbers. The NPDS number is greater than NEISS-AIP point estimate but within the 95% confidence interval. As NPDS is an actual count and NEISS-AIP is an extrapolation from a sample, to the extent that every child presenting to an ED following a medication exposure is not reported to a poison center, both databases may underestimate the problem. The NEISS-AIP extrapolation tool may need to be reassessed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the information from the American Association of Poison Control Centers National Poison Data System (AAOCC-NPDS) does not include medical examinations or final diagnoses. Estimates of pediatric acetaminophen exposure and overdose are similar between NEISS and AAPCC however, both may be underestimates of the rate of accidental pharmaceutical exposure and overdose among children [6]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the information from the American Association of Poison Control Centers National Poison Data System (AAOCC-NPDS) does not include medical examinations or final diagnoses. Estimates of pediatric acetaminophen exposure and overdose are similar between NEISS and AAPCC however, both may be underestimates of the rate of accidental pharmaceutical exposure and overdose among children [6]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is one of few instances in which ICD-9 codes were explicitly used to identify discharges related to acetaminophen exposure among children. As no “gold standard” measures exist and current surveillance and reporting methods may be flawed, it is important to re-evaluate and assess novel approaches for estimating acetaminophen overdose among the pediatric population [6]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, capturing infant poisonings may be challenging. Epidemiological estimates from both the AAPCC data and from nationwide ED records via the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System-All Injury Program (NEISS-AIPO) are both believed to significantly underestimate the true magnitude of the problem [7][8][9]. In that respect, the ToxIC and AAPCC registries complement each other, providing an effective, real-time toxicosurveillance coverage in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In children less than 5 years of age, there is an estimated sevenfold under-reporting of poison-related fatalities to PCCs and an even higher under-estimation of non-fatal cases [5]. Guardians of poisoned infants that attend the ED are not likely to have previously contacted a PCC [6][7][8][9][10]. The ToxIC case registry addresses that gap by documenting all inadvertent exposure presenting to participating sites and requiring bedside consultation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is estimated that only 20% to 30% of all poisoning cases are reported to RPCs, and therefore NPDS cases most likely represent the minimum number of actual exposures to a chemical or drug. 29,30 Also, due to the nature of these separate databases, it is impossible to determine if a case is reported in both datasets. Therefore these cases cannot be aggregated to generate an actual number of cases nationwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%