Emergence and Development of Health Risk Communication Networks Among Street-Level Health Bureaucrats During the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis in Myanmar

Abstract

Street-level health bureaucrats have actively contributed to implementing the COVID-19 prevention, control, and treatment policies of the Myanmar government. However, the need for bureaucrats on the frontlines of policy implementation to maintain a safe distance from others to prevent the spread of COVID-19 has posed challenges for the sharing and exchange of information related to health risks. In this context, this study examined what health risk communication patterns have emerged and developed among street-level health bureaucrats during the COVID-19 pandemic, and how this risk communication has been affected by street-level health bureaucrats’ perceptions of client meaningfulness and willingness to implement COVID-19 policies. The results reveal that street-level health bureaucrats in the health risk communication network are embedded in reciprocally or transitively connected discussion relationships that sustain their health risk communication over time. Moreover, when specific healthcare staff members perceive more benefits of COVID-19 policies for their patients and are more willing to care for patients, other healthcare staff avoid them to protect themselves from COVID-19 infection. Due to their higher level of understanding of the adopted measures, healthcare staff members who are highly willing to implement COVID-19 policies are frequently approached by other staff members to communicate about COVID-19 issues. This study empirically contributes to the literature on street-level bureaucrats in times of pandemic crisis by examining the formation of health risk communications in the context of street-level health bureaucrats’ responses to and participation in public healthcare policy implementation processes.

Street-level quasi-bureaucracy and professional discretion: how transformational leadership and public service motivation influence village health volunteers' professional discretion

“…Serving as mediators between the state and citizens and also as interpreters of public policy, street-level bureaucrats (SLBs) significantly affect policy implementation and outcomes (Tummers and Bekkers, 2013). They are the backbones of the public healthcare systems around the world (Myomin and Lim, 2022). In developing countries, such as Thailand, community health volunteers or village health volunteers serve a critical role in extending routine primary healthcare services to the vulnerable and rural populations in Thailand for decades (Sudhipongpracha and Poocharoen, 2021).…”

Protecting vulnerability. An international comparison of social workers as street-level bureaucrats during the COVID-19 lockdown

“…, 2021; Gofen and Lotta, 2021; Spanghero Lotta et al. , 2021; Myomin and Seunghoo Lim, 2022; Ogbonnaya et al. , 2022; Andraszak et al.…”

“…These groups faced challenges due to various factors such as physiological, social, psychological and structural limitations, which led to reduced autonomy, lack of power and limited agency (Liamputtong, 2007;Moore and Miller, 1999;Silva, 1995;Winfield, 2021;Put et al, 2021). Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been a renewed interest in studying the street-level bureaucracy theory worldwide, particularly in many countries in the South (Lima- Silva et al, 2020;Carlitz et al, 2021;Meza et al, 2021;Gofen and Lotta, 2021;Spanghero Lotta et al, 2021;Myomin and Seunghoo Lim, 2022;Ogbonnaya et al, 2022;Andraszak et al, 2023).…”