1993
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0720829
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embryonic Viability and Metabolism in Turkey Lines Selected for Egg Production or Growth

Abstract: Lines of turkeys selected genetically for rapid growth or egg production and their respective randombred control populations were examined for physiological factors influencing their hatchability. Hatchability of fertile eggs was improved (P < .05) in the growth line but not in the egg production line when compared with randombred control populations. Embryonic mortality of both selected lines was lower during the 1st wk of incubation but higher during pipping than that observed for the mortality of the random… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
12
2

Year Published

1993
1993
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
12
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase was linear for fertility but quadratic for hatch of fertile eggs. In a single-generation study, Christensen et al (1993) observed no differences in fertility and hatchability between Lines RBCl and E. The difference in fertility in the present study between the E and RBCl lines was relatively large (5.9%) but not significant. iRBCl, RBC2, RBC3 = randombred control populations; E = subline of RBCl selected for increased egg production; F = subline of RBC2 selected for increased 16-wk body weight; and FL = subline of F selected for increased shank width.…”
Section: Line Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The increase was linear for fertility but quadratic for hatch of fertile eggs. In a single-generation study, Christensen et al (1993) observed no differences in fertility and hatchability between Lines RBCl and E. The difference in fertility in the present study between the E and RBCl lines was relatively large (5.9%) but not significant. iRBCl, RBC2, RBC3 = randombred control populations; E = subline of RBCl selected for increased egg production; F = subline of RBC2 selected for increased 16-wk body weight; and FL = subline of F selected for increased shank width.…”
Section: Line Comparisonscontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…The ACRB eggs lost the average ideal egg weight loss of 12% at 18 d of incubation (Tullett, 1981). Studies have found that decreased moisture loss and conductance coincides with higher late embryonic mortality in turkeys (Christensen and McCorkle, 1982;Christensen et al, 1993;Christensen and Nestor, 1994); however, both chicken strains in the present study had equivalent embryonic mortality despite the lower calculated conductance of the Cobb 500 eggs.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Various studies have shown that high EST (Romanoff, 1936;French, 2000;Lourens et al, 2005) or low O 2 (Onagbesan et al, 2007) during incubation reduces hatchability, but the interaction between these 2 factors has not been previously assessed. First, the reduced hatchability at high EST and low O 2 might be related to a difference in nutrient mobilization and utilization during incubation, resulting in decreased availability of nutrients (e.g., glycogen) for the energy-demanding hatching process (Beattie, 1964;Christensen et al, 1993). Second, embryos at high EST and low O 2 had the lowest YFB mass and tended to have the highest residual yolk weight.…”
Section: Est × O 2 Concentrationmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Although the consequences of suboptimal incubation on survival rate and embryonic development are evident, the underlying effects on nutrient utilization and body composition have not been assessed. Nutrient utilization for embryonic growth under different incubation conditions during the prenatal and early postnatal period may explain differences in hatchability, embryonic development, and metabolism (Christensen et al, 1993;Leksrisompong et al, 2007;Lourens et al, 2007). Therefore, this study assessed the effects of 2 EST and 3 O 2 concentrations on the survival rate and nutrient utilization for growth in chicken embryos.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%