2012
DOI: 10.3167/proj.2012.060206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embodied Visual Meaning: Image Schemas in Film

Abstract: This article examines embodied visual meaning in film, the ways that film makes use of recurring dynamic patterns of our shared bodily interactions with the world (image schemas) to communicate abstract meaning to the viewer. Following the lead of recent discoveries in the field of neuroscience, the article argues that this metaphorical transference of abstract thought by means of image schemas is possible via the activation of embodied mirroring mechanisms in the observer. This empathetic and physical encount… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Ortiz, 2011;Coëgnarts & Kravanja, 2012). In The Gate, vertical camera angles are used repeatedly throughout the movie.…”
Section: Aftershockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ortiz, 2011;Coëgnarts & Kravanja, 2012). In The Gate, vertical camera angles are used repeatedly throughout the movie.…”
Section: Aftershockmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although recent work in cognitive studies clearly puts more emphasis on forms of communication that are not (exclusively) verbal (Coëgnarts & Kravanja, 2012a, 2012bFahlenbrach, 2008;Forceville, 2002Forceville, , 2009Forceville, , 2011Forceville & Jeulink, 2011, Kappelhoff & Müller, 2011Ortiz, 2011Ortiz, , 2014Winter, 2014), there still has been little evidence gathered with regard to the nonverbal manifestations of time metaphors. Finding comparative evidence other than linguistic, however, is essential because it helps to overcome one of the most important criticisms of cognitive linguistic studies on metaphor, namely, the danger of circular-reasoning (Forceville, 2009;Forceville & Jeulink, 2011;Gibbs & Perlman, 2006;Pecher & Van Dantzig, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Our previous work (Coëgnarts and Kravanja, 2012, 2014b, 2015b, 2016aCoëgnarts et al, 2016) can be seen as a series of attempts to explore and illustrate this line of reasoning with respect to various target domains of character subjectivity. Two such case-studies (character perception and character emotions) will be presented in the second application part below of this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%