2015
DOI: 10.1080/10926488.2015.1049508
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

With the Pastin Front ofthe Character: Evidence for Spatial-Temporal Metaphors in Cinema

Abstract: Cognitive research on Ego-Reference-Point models of time in English traditionally shows that "FUTURE IS IN FRONT OF EGO" and "PAST IS IN BACK OF EGO." Recently, however, this view has been challenged by other results, showing that there exists a major static model of time wherein "FUTURE IS IN BACK OF EGO" and "PAST IS IN FRONT OF EGO." However, evidence for both conceptual systems comes predominantly from linguistic and gestural forms of expression.For instance, convincing empirical evidence coming from the m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having discussed how perception is conceptualized, we now turn to its articulation in fi lm: How are the conceptual metaphors and metonymies of perception, as discussed in the previous section, manifested cinematically? To answer this question we would like to draw on our earlier work on cinematic subjectivity (Coëgnarts and Kravanja 2014, 2015a, 2015b. In these publications we argued that the character's visual experience (i.e., the idea of a character S seeing an outer event O) can be elicited cinematically by relating the four conceptual structures (see Figure 1) to the visual content of the fi lmic frame.…”
Section: From Concept To Form: Embodying Character Perception Cinematmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Having discussed how perception is conceptualized, we now turn to its articulation in fi lm: How are the conceptual metaphors and metonymies of perception, as discussed in the previous section, manifested cinematically? To answer this question we would like to draw on our earlier work on cinematic subjectivity (Coëgnarts and Kravanja 2014, 2015a, 2015b. In these publications we argued that the character's visual experience (i.e., the idea of a character S seeing an outer event O) can be elicited cinematically by relating the four conceptual structures (see Figure 1) to the visual content of the fi lmic frame.…”
Section: From Concept To Form: Embodying Character Perception Cinematmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this reason the study of conceptual metaphor cannot be restricted to the study of language alone (see also Forceville 2009Forceville , 2011Forceville and Jeulink 2011;Gibbs and Perlman 2006: 215). For instance, if conceptual metaphors are modality-independent, it is plausible to assume that the same embodied conceptual structures that lie at the heart of our linguistic expressions of perception are also pervasive in those fi lmic expressions that convey information about the perceptual states of fi lm characters (Coëgnarts and Kravanja 2014, 2015a, 2015b.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elsewhere (Coëgnarts and Kravanja, 2014b, 2015b, 2016a we have argued that film is similarly capable of eliciting the conceptual solutions, as raised above, to express the characters' subjective experience of seeing. It is through the forces of cinema (for example, framing, editing, camera movement) and the formal density they impose onto the first-order reality, that we have claimed, that the viewer is prompted to see a fictional character (S) and the object of his or her perception (O) as spatially connected to each other, and by further metaphorical extension that S sees O.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in order for the viewer to anchor additional higher-order meaning to the perception of characters, often further contextual information is needed. This is especially the case with flashbacks that are introduced through the perception of characters (see, for example, Coëgnarts and Kravanja, 2015b;Coëgnarts et al, 2016). To judge whether or not the perceived event by the character is temporally discontinuous (for example, to map O onto the past), one has to have perceived the content of the event before (equally through a prior filmed event or, differently, through textually channelled information).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation