2013
DOI: 10.5367/ihe.2013.0153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedding Enterprise: A Business School Undergraduate Course with an Enterprise Focus

Abstract: This study profiles, through a case study of an undergraduate business programme, how a business school has embedded the theme of enterprise in its core undergraduate programme. Key participants in the development of the strategy and programme tutors and students were interviewed, to provide information for an analysis of the principle objectives and the impact of the course. The findings confirm the need to adopt a top-down strategy to identify underpinning themes that support all programme activitie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(34 reference statements)
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it is argued that EE programmes provide the opportunity to develop subject specific knowledge and experience (DeTienne and Chandler, 2004;Politis, 2005). In addition, the extant literature reveals several studies measuring immediate changes in entrepreneurial attitudes as a result of an EE intervention (Peterman and Kennedy, 2003;Souitaris et al, 2007;Packham et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2013). Some authors, however, continue to question the effective integration of entrepreneurship into the curriculum (see Hannon, 2006), the extent to which it benefits students (Chell and Allman, 2003) and the effectiveness of formal and informal EE (Hytti and O'Gorman, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it is argued that EE programmes provide the opportunity to develop subject specific knowledge and experience (DeTienne and Chandler, 2004;Politis, 2005). In addition, the extant literature reveals several studies measuring immediate changes in entrepreneurial attitudes as a result of an EE intervention (Peterman and Kennedy, 2003;Souitaris et al, 2007;Packham et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2013). Some authors, however, continue to question the effective integration of entrepreneurship into the curriculum (see Hannon, 2006), the extent to which it benefits students (Chell and Allman, 2003) and the effectiveness of formal and informal EE (Hytti and O'Gorman, 2004).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Incorporating initiatives into undergraduate education which specifically address documented deficiencies in graduate work performance is critical for bridging endemic skills gaps. Student competitions, skill development programs and WIL, in addition to the 'Entrepreneurs in Action' [Enactus] initiative (Jones et al, 2013), are central to developing creativity and enterprise in undergraduates. Providing students with opportunities to participate in volunteering and service learning is important for developing an understanding of the importance and principles of corporate and social responsibility.…”
Section: Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have focused on measuring 'soft' impacts such as positive changes in entrepreneurial attitudes as a result of an entrepreneurial education experience (Krueger et al, 2000;Peterman and Kennedy, 2003;Souitaris et al, 2007;Packham et al, 2010;Jones et al, 2013). While such studies are informative, economically sustainable graduate start-ups, as a consequence of an entrepreneurial intervention, will remain the key measurement for entrepreneurial education (Rasmussen and Sørheim, 2006).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%