Embeddedness estrutural e espacial em redes estratégicas: efeitos atitudinais no nível das díades

Abstract

Este artigo pode ser copiado, distribuído, exibido, transmitido ou adaptado desde que citados, de forma clara e explícita, o nome da revista, a edição, o ano, e as páginas nas quais o artigo foi publicado originalmente, mas sem sugerir que a RAM endosse a reutilização do artigo. Esse termo de licenciamento deve ser explicitado para os casos de reutilização ou distribuição para terceiros. Não é permitido o uso para fins comerciais.

Social Network Analysis and Dyadic Identification in the Classroom

“…This causes the order of the actors to change randomly, even without changing the network structure. The distribution generated from it allows the calculation of the statistical significance of the coefficients (Dekker, Krackhardt, & Snijders, 2007;Maciel et al, 2014).…”

“…The relational matrix formed by this question served to generate four sociometric measures extracted in the analysis with the support of UCINET © 6.485 software: degree centrality (prominence), local density (cohesion), structural holes (brokerage), and structural equivalence (position) (Nooy et al, 2005). Relational matrices were constructed as indicated by Borgatti et al (2013) and have already been used by Maciel, Taffarel, and Camargo (2014).…”

Social immersion, spatial bricolage and entrepreneurship in the context of traditional communities

“…According to Scazziota et al, (2020), in general, the bricolage approach occurs from different behavioral mechanisms and developed tools, in addition to reviewing matters emerging from entrepreneurship. Related studies usually address the benefits of bricolage to entrepreneurs in different structural situations, Stinchfield et al, (2013), like Maciel et al (2014), andDuymedjian &Rüling, (2010). Regardless of the bricolage approach or application, these concepts converge and create a spatial analysis like spatial bricolage, especially in the context of communities.…”