2008 Symposium on VLSI Technology 2008
DOI: 10.1109/vlsit.2008.4588592
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded split-gate flash memory with silicon nanocrystals for 90nm and beyond

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 Nanocrystal memory array For successful memory product introduction, individual nanocrystal bitcells must perform repeatably when built in an array of thousands or millions of bytes [25]. Each bitcell must program to a verify level in a defined write time, and erase to a verify level in a defined erase time, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Bitcell Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 Nanocrystal memory array For successful memory product introduction, individual nanocrystal bitcells must perform repeatably when built in an array of thousands or millions of bytes [25]. Each bitcell must program to a verify level in a defined write time, and erase to a verify level in a defined erase time, as illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Bitcell Operationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Split-gate flash memory has been widely studied for embedded memory applications thanks to its high programming efficiency, low power consumption and immunity to over-erase problem. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] Source-side injection (SSI) of hot electrons is most commonly utilized to program the cell because both high lateral and vertical field are obtained in the gap region with proper bias. 1) The charge-storage layer of split-gate memory can be floating poly, nitride 9) or nanocrystal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The charge-storage layer of split-gate memory can be floating poly, nitride 9) or nanocrystal. 11) For split-gate memory cell with floating poly, it can be erased by uniform channel Fowler-Nordheim (FN) erase, 3) source-junction-side FN erase, 2) or poly-topoly FN erase. 5) In ref.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difficulty in scaling the tunnel oxide (TO) thickness due to stress-induced leakage-current-related charge loss, reduction in gate coupling, and increase in cell-to-cell interference have made scaling of FG flash difficult at sub-3× node [2]. Nanocrystal (NC) flash [3]- [12] and charge trap flash (CTF) [13], [14] are considered as possible alternatives. CTF devices reported so far show good memory window but poor retention [13], [14], while the NC devices show poor memory window [4], [6], [11], [12].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously reported small memory window of the NC devices can be attributed to nonoptimal NC number density (ND), size distribution, small area coverage (AC), and low NC WF or high control dielectric (CD) leakage. A significant amount of work on NC-based Flash memory structures has focused on semiconductor NCs like Si [3] and Ge [4]. Issues with semiconductor-based NCs are small WF, quantum-confinement (QC)-related WF lowering, and poor control of NC size that result in poor overall performance of such devices.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%