Embedded librarianship: questions and answers from librarians in the trenches

Abstract

This paper aims to share the current state of embedded librarianship in learning management systems as reported by academic librarians. The paper highlights the best practices, as well as continuing questions, in the field of embedded librarianship. Design/methodology/approach The authors collected participant feedback in two active, participatory panel discussions at national conferences. The open forums were centered on three guiding themes of embedded librarianship: building connections with faculty and students; utilizing technology tools; and providing information literacy and assessment. Participants answered directed questions, and their responses were recorded and analyzed for this paper. Findings Librarians report an increasing demand for library services in learning management systems. Collaboration and partnerships across campus are required for successful embedded librarian projects. Technology tools continue to evolve and change, and most librarians can anticipate using multiple learning management systems over time. There is an ongoing need for professional development in online library instruction and assessment. Originality/value This paper provides a snapshot of the current state of embedded librarianship in learning management systems. It offers insights about what academic librarians value, what they have learned and what concerns they still have about library instruction in online environments.

Librarians’ competencies for implementing embedded librarianship in university libraries

“…Some extant studies (Luca, 2019; Moruf, 2020; Si and Wen-ming, 2012) cite embedded librarianship as one of the most important models adopted by academic libraries to deliver services to users outside of library settings. The model emerged as a new approach to enhance the use of library services and resources so as to maintain the relevance of academic libraries and librarians (Brady, 2021; Gaha et al, 2018; Gregory, 2018; Hoffman et al, 2017; Kvenild et al, 2016; Lowe et al, 2020; Raish, 2018; Wu and Mi, 2013; Clyde and Lee 2011). To a great extent, the model is an inevitable outcome of the information era in which libraries are facing a growing need to bring their services and resources close to users (Carlson and Kneale, 2011; Drewes and Hoffman, 2010; Matthew and Schroeder, 2006; Nagarkar and Murari, 2010).…”

Embedded librarianship and Greek academic libraries

“…Since collaboration and communication are important factors for successful implementation of embedded librarians (Drewes and Hoffman, 2010;Kvenild et al, 2016;Zanin-Yost, 2018), question 16 aims to discover the level of collaboration between librarians and teaching professionals. According to Table 7, embedded librarians have low participation in curriculum design (i.e.…”

Authentic Assessment of Student Learning in an Online Class: Implications for Embedded Practice

“…Adding a picture or an introductory video or posting contact information make it more likely for students to view the librarian as a trusted research companion whom one can ask for help. 11 Cuthbertson and Falcone stress the importance of including some type of synchronous communication among the students and the instructors to create a sense of community. 12 Research that recommends adding visuals to the course, emphasizing a personal touch, and being proactive have greatly informed this study's approach to working with this cohort of online adult students.…”