2001
DOI: 10.1002/1097-0207(20010228)50:6<1269::aid-nme11>3.0.co;2-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Embedded crack model: I. Basic formulation

Abstract: The recently emerged idea of enriching standard finite element interpolations by strain or displacement discontinuities has triggered the development of powerful techniques that allow efficient modelling of regions with highly localized strains, e.g. of fracture zones in concrete, or shear bands in metals or soils. The present paper describes a triangular element with an embedded displacement discontinuity that represents a crack. The constitutive model is formulated within the framework of damage theory, with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
66
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These degrees of freedom give rise to both: i) a translation and ii) a rotation. The first case was taken into account in the former embedded formulations, namely in the works presented in Simo et al [10], Lofti and Shing [11], Armero and Callari [12], Oliver [14,15], Jirásek and Zimmermann [17,18], Borja [20], Wells and Sluys [21], Alfaiate et al [22], where a constant jump was adopted. Thus, the present formulation can also be considered as a generalization of the former embedded discontinuity models, in which the rigid body rotation is additionally considered.…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These degrees of freedom give rise to both: i) a translation and ii) a rotation. The first case was taken into account in the former embedded formulations, namely in the works presented in Simo et al [10], Lofti and Shing [11], Armero and Callari [12], Oliver [14,15], Jirásek and Zimmermann [17,18], Borja [20], Wells and Sluys [21], Alfaiate et al [22], where a constant jump was adopted. Thus, the present formulation can also be considered as a generalization of the former embedded discontinuity models, in which the rigid body rotation is additionally considered.…”
Section: Discretizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the former case, the discontinuities are modelled as finite width bands and the displacement field remains continuous [7], whereas in the second case, the kinematics of a true discontinuous displacement field is approximated. Many examples of the strong discontinuity approach can be found in literature [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22], which are compared and discussed in [23]. Moreover, towards a unified view of both weak and strong discontinuities, Oliver et al [24,25] introduced a continuum strong discontinuity approach (CSDA), in which a strong discontinuity is consistently obtained from a weak discontinuity when the crack band width tends to zero.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is a general technique of EFEM. The standard FEM is applied for the continuous strain and the discontinuous strain is transformed from the crack opening width (e) by means of scalable effective length of the element ( eff l ), which is the projection of the element on the normal to the crack direction [16,19]. That is,…”
Section: Additional Assumptions For the Current Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are many different approaches available in the literature, which can simulate material separation. Most approaches are based on nodal [1][2][3][4] or element enrichment techniques [5][6][7][8][9][10][11], or even on remeshing strategies [12][13][14]. These approaches were typically validated using benchmark tests with few cracks and by comparing overall displacements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%