Abstract:The article aims at exploring some elements so as to provide a theoretical framework concerning the non-state public bureaucracy -the so called non profit NGOs which operates in the public sphere and are allegedly not prone to state bureaucracies' dysfunctions. The author follows a three step methodology: a) concept building on state bureaucracies' dysfunctions related to political and other organizational issues which underlies ineffectiveness, patrimonial action and bureaucratic insulation; b) comparative an… Show more
“…An argument against this inclusion would be that the Third Sector is part of the Market, as its maximum expression of freedom of action by society, as presented by Neoliberalism, or is a mere auxiliary to the State, as presented by some heterodox theorists. However, a more conceptual analysis of the principles that guide each of these sectors, demonstrates conceptual independence and action of the Third Sector, pointing to its dynamism, importance for the development of the economies of countries, and issues of equity and social inclusion [63,65].…”
Section: Directions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in principle between the three sectors of the economy is presented as follows: the Market is governed by the pursuit of profit, with all its actions guided by this principle; the State is governed by the rule, the bureaucracy, which seeks to follow the bureaucratic principle of Legality, Impersonality, Morality, Publicity, and Efficiency [66]; whereas for the Third Sector, the principle that governs it is orientation by the absolute value of the action, by the logic of the cause [65,67]. This difference in principle implies that the third sector has an action very different from the Market and the State, abandoning issues such as impersonality, the rule of law that guides the action of the State, or the search for profit and competitive advantage, which guides the action of organizations that are part of the Market.…”
Section: Directions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in principle implies that the third sector has an action very different from the Market and the State, abandoning issues such as impersonality, the rule of law that guides the action of the State, or the search for profit and competitive advantage, which guides the action of organizations that are part of the Market. This differentiated orientation can foster and promote the social changes necessary for growth in society to be sustained in the long term [63,65]. It can also foster income distribution and social inclusion that other economic actors have difficulty fostering because of its principles, acting not only as an agent of welfare but as an active actor in social transformation [65,68].…”
Section: Directions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differentiated orientation can foster and promote the social changes necessary for growth in society to be sustained in the long term [63,65]. It can also foster income distribution and social inclusion that other economic actors have difficulty fostering because of its principles, acting not only as an agent of welfare but as an active actor in social transformation [65,68].…”
Studies focusing on the theory of New Developmentalism have been growing in recent years. This has happened since the great crisis of Neoliberalism in 2008, which pointed to the exhaustion of the financial-rentier Neoliberal model as a solution to issues related to the development of countries. Based on this diagnosis, we proposed a bibliometric analysis that shows the past, the present, and the future possibilities (trends) within the field of New Developmentalism. For the execution of this Bibliometrics, we searched for the articles published and indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases using the search term "New Developmentalism". The result pointed to 749 published articles. The search used the term in all the search fields available in the databases, excluding no possibilities. These data were treated in “Biblioshiny” within the RStudio software and the results were analyzed to generate a mapping of the field of study. The results of this study show that this is still a new field of study and that it needs a lot of research to reach maturity. An even more evident gap is the scarcity of studies that address the macroeconomic prices important for the growth of national economies, as pointed out by the New Developmentalism Theory of Brasser-Pereira. In this gap, we identify arguments contrary to the theory that need to be addressed and empirically researched to be accepted or refuted. By working this gap, we would bring light to points not yet explored and enrich the discussions. The problem of the role of the State as a promoter of the conditions for the economic development of countries, in contrast to the Neoliberalism that advocates a minimal State, is also an aspect little explored by empirical articles, requiring further study. Another important point that needs to be addressed is the incorporation of the ecological and social agenda, especially that of income distribution in the studies of the application of the New Developmentalism Theory. In this gap, the inclusion of the third sector in the New Developmentalism Theory as an agent distinct from the State and the Market could be a solution and an innovation. The third sector's principle is to promote and bring about structural changes in society that are very important for the economic and social development of countries. This inclusion helps in the expansion of income distribution and social development processes that the State, based on rules (Bureaucracy), and the Market, based on profit (competition), are unable to accomplish. We also identify the need for a more particularized delineation of the identification of New Developmentalism Theory, generating a label that does not confuse with other theories. Thus, we seek to contribute to the field of study by showing the advances made so far and pointing out directions that can be followed by other researchers who wish to expand the study of New Developmentalism Theory.
“…An argument against this inclusion would be that the Third Sector is part of the Market, as its maximum expression of freedom of action by society, as presented by Neoliberalism, or is a mere auxiliary to the State, as presented by some heterodox theorists. However, a more conceptual analysis of the principles that guide each of these sectors, demonstrates conceptual independence and action of the Third Sector, pointing to its dynamism, importance for the development of the economies of countries, and issues of equity and social inclusion [63,65].…”
Section: Directions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in principle between the three sectors of the economy is presented as follows: the Market is governed by the pursuit of profit, with all its actions guided by this principle; the State is governed by the rule, the bureaucracy, which seeks to follow the bureaucratic principle of Legality, Impersonality, Morality, Publicity, and Efficiency [66]; whereas for the Third Sector, the principle that governs it is orientation by the absolute value of the action, by the logic of the cause [65,67]. This difference in principle implies that the third sector has an action very different from the Market and the State, abandoning issues such as impersonality, the rule of law that guides the action of the State, or the search for profit and competitive advantage, which guides the action of organizations that are part of the Market.…”
Section: Directions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difference in principle implies that the third sector has an action very different from the Market and the State, abandoning issues such as impersonality, the rule of law that guides the action of the State, or the search for profit and competitive advantage, which guides the action of organizations that are part of the Market. This differentiated orientation can foster and promote the social changes necessary for growth in society to be sustained in the long term [63,65]. It can also foster income distribution and social inclusion that other economic actors have difficulty fostering because of its principles, acting not only as an agent of welfare but as an active actor in social transformation [65,68].…”
Section: Directions For Future Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This differentiated orientation can foster and promote the social changes necessary for growth in society to be sustained in the long term [63,65]. It can also foster income distribution and social inclusion that other economic actors have difficulty fostering because of its principles, acting not only as an agent of welfare but as an active actor in social transformation [65,68].…”
Studies focusing on the theory of New Developmentalism have been growing in recent years. This has happened since the great crisis of Neoliberalism in 2008, which pointed to the exhaustion of the financial-rentier Neoliberal model as a solution to issues related to the development of countries. Based on this diagnosis, we proposed a bibliometric analysis that shows the past, the present, and the future possibilities (trends) within the field of New Developmentalism. For the execution of this Bibliometrics, we searched for the articles published and indexed in the Web of Science and Scopus databases using the search term "New Developmentalism". The result pointed to 749 published articles. The search used the term in all the search fields available in the databases, excluding no possibilities. These data were treated in “Biblioshiny” within the RStudio software and the results were analyzed to generate a mapping of the field of study. The results of this study show that this is still a new field of study and that it needs a lot of research to reach maturity. An even more evident gap is the scarcity of studies that address the macroeconomic prices important for the growth of national economies, as pointed out by the New Developmentalism Theory of Brasser-Pereira. In this gap, we identify arguments contrary to the theory that need to be addressed and empirically researched to be accepted or refuted. By working this gap, we would bring light to points not yet explored and enrich the discussions. The problem of the role of the State as a promoter of the conditions for the economic development of countries, in contrast to the Neoliberalism that advocates a minimal State, is also an aspect little explored by empirical articles, requiring further study. Another important point that needs to be addressed is the incorporation of the ecological and social agenda, especially that of income distribution in the studies of the application of the New Developmentalism Theory. In this gap, the inclusion of the third sector in the New Developmentalism Theory as an agent distinct from the State and the Market could be a solution and an innovation. The third sector's principle is to promote and bring about structural changes in society that are very important for the economic and social development of countries. This inclusion helps in the expansion of income distribution and social development processes that the State, based on rules (Bureaucracy), and the Market, based on profit (competition), are unable to accomplish. We also identify the need for a more particularized delineation of the identification of New Developmentalism Theory, generating a label that does not confuse with other theories. Thus, we seek to contribute to the field of study by showing the advances made so far and pointing out directions that can be followed by other researchers who wish to expand the study of New Developmentalism Theory.
Resumo Este artigo procura discutir os avanços recentes da contrarreforma do Estado na saúde, particularmente na privatização da gestão para organizações sociais, e ainda apresenta um enfoque teórico explicativo desse fenômeno na atualidade. São investigadas as novas configurações do sistema de saúde brasileiro resultantes das interações entre o Estado e o mercado, mediante a abordagem dos anos que se iniciam no primeiro governo Lula, de 2003 até o presente, e enfoque das organizações sociais sediadas ou atuantes nos estados do Rio de Janeiro e de São Paulo. A despeito das expectativas criadas de mudanças substanciais na política econômica e social, o governo Lula manteve elementos importantes dos governos que o precederam a partir dos anos 1990. No plano estadual, o governo Sérgio Cabral Filho priorizou claramente a terceirização. É feita uma análise crítica dos argumentos empregados para impulsionar essa contrarreforma, utilizando-se algumas análises de casos. Ao final, elabora-se uma tese explicativa desse avanço à luz das transformações da base material e da superestrutura política do capitalismo contemporâneo e da formação social brasileira. Palavras-chave organizações sociais; contrarreforma do Estado; saúde e mercado.Abstract This article discusses the recent progress made in the counter-reform of the State in health, particularly in the privatization of the management for social organizations, and it also presents an explanatory theoretical focus on this phenomenon today. The new settings of the Brazilian health system resulting from the interactions between the State and the market are investigated by addressing the years beginning in the first Lula administration, from 2003 to the present, and the focus of the social organizations based or active in the states of Rio de Janeiro and São Paulo. Despite the expectations created for substantial changes in the economic and social policies, the Lula administration maintained important elements of governments that preceded him from the 1990s. At the state level, the Sérgio Cabral Filho administration clearly prioritized outsourcing. A critical analysis of the arguments used to boost this counter-reform is made based on a few case studies. At the end, an explanatory thesis is presented on the progress made in the light of the transformations of the material base, of the political superstructure of contemporary capitalism, and of the Brazilian social formation. Keywords social organizations; counter-reform of the State; health and market.
Este artigo apresenta um histórico da trajetória da lei que cria a Empresa Brasileira de Serviços Hospitalares (EBSERH) em 2011, contextualiza essa criação nas conjunturas internacional e nacional, e apresenta e discute as principais mudanças nela contidas. Essa trajetória é problematizada a partir das mudanças ocorridas no Congresso Nacional desde a Medida Provisória 520. O contexto é analisado com base nas justificativas da criação da EBSERH à luz do cenário de crise econômica internacional. Nacionalmente, o texto insere a empresa na perspectiva da reforma do Estado iniciada em 1995. Esta é apresentada em duas gerações, com base na bibliografia consultada, sendo a EBSERH própria de uma segunda geração de reformas ditas institucionais. Na saúde, a separação entre o financiamento e a prestação dentro do Estado e a competição entre prestadores públicos e privados são tomadas como norte para a análise. Apresentam-se e discutem-se as principais mudanças da lei que cria a EBSERH, especialmente quanto a financiamento, relacionamento com as universidades, relações de trabalho e controle social. São apresentados possíveis impactos sobre o ensino médico.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.