1996
DOI: 10.1128/aem.62.9.3470-3473.1996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elution of viruses by ionic and nonionic surfactants

Abstract: The ionic and nonionic surfactants sodium dodecyl sulfate and Triton X-100, respectively, eluted two viruses, X174 and PRD1, which were adsorbed to the ionic and nonionic binding membranes cationic polysulfone and nitrocellulose, respectively. Results indicated that complete elution was readily achieved only when combinations of surfactants and binding membranes were matched (i.e., ionic-ionic or nonionic-nonionic).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of surfactant type (ionic and nonionic) and membrane binding type on the elution of two viruses (phi Xl74 410 and PR01) was investigated by Fujito and Lytle (1996). Complete elution of the virus only was achieved using matched combinations of surfactants and binding membranes.…”
Section: Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of surfactant type (ionic and nonionic) and membrane binding type on the elution of two viruses (phi Xl74 410 and PR01) was investigated by Fujito and Lytle (1996). Complete elution of the virus only was achieved using matched combinations of surfactants and binding membranes.…”
Section: Virusesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No similar effect has been reported in the literature, except for mention of a higher bacteriophage titer achieved within an emulsion . Bacteriophages may be protected against inactivation due to “charge shielding” between bacteriophage surface proteins and nano‐emulsion droplets . This shielding mechanism, which could preserve lytic activity, and combined with more favorable contact between bacteriophage and bacteria in the presence of emulsion, could result in an enhanced killing effect.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…49 Bacteriophages may be protected against inactivation due to "charge shielding" between bacteriophage surface proteins and nano-emulsion droplets. 50 This shielding mechanism, which could preserve lytic activity, and combined with more favorable contact between bacteriophage and bacteria in the presence of emulsion, could result in an enhanced killing effect. The literature suggests that certain surfactants (e.g., emulsan) do not interfere with phage binding to bacterial surfaces; moreover, the binding occurs at the emulsion interface.…”
Section: Efficacy Of Bacteriophage Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonionic surfactants Triton X-100 and Tween 80 and ionic surfactant SDS are commonly used in virus adsorption/elution to control the surface tension of the fluid and to prevent virus adsorption. While Triton X-100 would be expected to affect nonionic adsorption only, the anionic SDS would be expected to affect both ionic and nonionic adsorption and specifically counteract the adsorption forces (American Society for Testing and Materials, 1995;Fujito, B.T., Lytle, C.D. 1996;Lytle et al, 1992;Retta et al, 1991).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%