2000
DOI: 10.1080/10584600050179013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elite Messages and Source Cues: Moving Beyond Partisanship

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These findings contradict a large body of work that shows African-Americans are strongly influenced by messages from African-American political leaders (Domke et al 2000;Hurley 1994, 1996;Zaller 1992). What accounts of the comparative weakness of elites in directing African-American views on commonality?…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These findings contradict a large body of work that shows African-Americans are strongly influenced by messages from African-American political leaders (Domke et al 2000;Hurley 1994, 1996;Zaller 1992). What accounts of the comparative weakness of elites in directing African-American views on commonality?…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…As outlined above, a number of studies have found that messages from elites who share a respondent's racial identity are more influential in shaping opinion than messages from elites who do not share this identity (Domke et al 2000;Hurley 1994, 1996;Nelson, Sanbonmatsu, and McClerking 2007). Most notably, Hurley (1994, 1996) found that exposure to a fictional message concerning the black community delivered by Clarence Thomas or Jesse Jackson had a greater influence on black opinion than the same message delivered by Ted Kennedy or George Bush.…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This perspective takes as a given that a vast majority of citizens do not directly experience politics, nor do they hold strong, stable attitudes about many social topics; rather, people form attitudes "on the fly," often in response to particular features of the information environment (Iyengar 1991;Zaller 1992). In essence, contextual features serve as heuristics that allow individuals to make cognitive shortcuts when processing political information (Domke et al 2000;Kuklinski and Hurley 1994;Mondak 1993). Emphasis on certain issues in news coverage is thought to prime the public to focus upon those considerations as standards for social judgment.…”
Section: Issue Regimes and Political Judgmentmentioning
confidence: 99%