1997
DOI: 10.1080/03147539708713166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elite democracy, development and people power: contending ideologies and changing practices in Philippine politics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the Philippines, however, it is argued that there are other significant social forces at work. In particular, Chinese businesses and the ''new rich'' are seen to play crucial roles (Pinches, 1996;Pinches, 1997;Rivera, 1994;Rivera and Koike, 1995). To understand how the Chinese businesses operated and contributed to state formation, approaches to the Chinese business network must be considered.…”
Section: State-society Relations and Chinese Business Networkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the Philippines, however, it is argued that there are other significant social forces at work. In particular, Chinese businesses and the ''new rich'' are seen to play crucial roles (Pinches, 1996;Pinches, 1997;Rivera, 1994;Rivera and Koike, 1995). To understand how the Chinese businesses operated and contributed to state formation, approaches to the Chinese business network must be considered.…”
Section: State-society Relations and Chinese Business Networkmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To quote Pinches, the 1986 uprising 'forced political and economic elites to give greater recognition to popular political agency'. 48 As a consequence, 'government and opposition politicians alike . .…”
Section: Restoration Of Democracymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These approving popular sentiments toward leaders with ‘authoritarian’ tendencies comport to the realities of post-authoritarian Philippines. Despite the gains of People Power—seen as a global symbol for a peaceful transition of political power from authoritarianism to democracy—it has been halted by perennial problems of corruption, social unrest, presidential patronage, elite democracy, anti-developmental policies, and even human rights violations reminiscent of Marcos’ time (Abinales, 2011; Bello et al, 2005; Hedman, 2001, 2006; Pinches, 1997; Quimpo, 2009; Thompson, 1995). In addition, failure to broaden the field for political competition not only inhibits economic growth and adversely affects governance and delivery of public goods (Balisacan and Fuwa, 2004; Tusalem and Pe-Aguirre, 2013), but it has also rendered the Philippines in a perpetual state of anti-development, contradictory economic policies, and entrenched poverty (Abinales, 2011; Balisacan and Hill, 2003; Bello et al, 2005; Mendoza et al, 2016; Nye, 2011; Ringuet and Estrada, 2003).…”
Section: Do Filipinos Trust Institutions?mentioning
confidence: 99%