“…These approving popular sentiments toward leaders with ‘authoritarian’ tendencies comport to the realities of post-authoritarian Philippines. Despite the gains of People Power—seen as a global symbol for a peaceful transition of political power from authoritarianism to democracy—it has been halted by perennial problems of corruption, social unrest, presidential patronage, elite democracy, anti-developmental policies, and even human rights violations reminiscent of Marcos’ time (Abinales, 2011; Bello et al, 2005; Hedman, 2001, 2006; Pinches, 1997; Quimpo, 2009; Thompson, 1995). In addition, failure to broaden the field for political competition not only inhibits economic growth and adversely affects governance and delivery of public goods (Balisacan and Fuwa, 2004; Tusalem and Pe-Aguirre, 2013), but it has also rendered the Philippines in a perpetual state of anti-development, contradictory economic policies, and entrenched poverty (Abinales, 2011; Balisacan and Hill, 2003; Bello et al, 2005; Mendoza et al, 2016; Nye, 2011; Ringuet and Estrada, 2003).…”