Eliminative Materialism and Ordinary Language

Lorca, Daniel; LaRock, Eric

doi:10.5840/pc201921236

Philosophia Christi

2019

DOI: 10.5840/pc201921236

|View full text |Cite

Eliminative Materialism and Ordinary Language

Daniel Lorca¹,

Eric LaRock²

Abstract: Advocates of eliminative materialism (EM) assure us that our current, ordinary approach to describing the mind (dubbed “folk psychology”) will eventually be eliminated, instead of reduced, by a matured neuroscience. However, once we take into account the flexibility, explanatory power, and overall sophistication of ordinary language, then the promissory note offered by eliminative materialism (EM) loses all credibility. To bolster the preceding claim, we present three original problems for EM: (1) the accounta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2022

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Legal consciousness as a prerequisite for person’s lawful behavior: retrospective view, modern interpretation

Shulha

2022

Pravo bezpeka

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The basics for legal consciousness as a prerequisite for lawful behavior of a person have been investigated. It has been noted that in today’s conditions the term “legal consciousness” is understood broadly, it covers, which is paradoxical or insufficiently correct from a critical point of view, both conscious and unconscious in the legal sphere of the inner world of man, that is, there is a need to distinguish between the concepts of “legal consciousness” and “legal subconsciousness”. It has been noted that in the context of the logic of formation of the mechanism of internal determination of lawful behavior in the structure of legal consciousness of a person, static and dynamic parts can be conditionally distinguished. The statics of legal consciousness is embodied by legal awareness (“knowledge of law”) as a psychological basis for the conscious implementation of legal norms. The dynamic element is understood as a certain generalized internal driving force (conscious, unconscious) that leads to the objectification of lawful behavior. The dynamics of legal consciousness is embodied by the motivation of lawful behavior (“lawful motivation”). The motivation of a person’s lawful behavior should be distinguished from the psychological mechanism of the law, the mechanism of making a lawful decision by a person, the mechanism of conscious-willful lawful behavior of a person, while the motivation is not reduced to motives as a certain set (set) of them. Distinguishing between the motivation of conscious lawful behavior and the motivation of objectively lawful behavior of a person indicates the existence of such phenomena as quasi-legal consciousness, quasi-legal motivation. It has been emphasized that a variant of debatable terminology that reflects the psychological mechanism of law is the phrase “negative motives” and “positive motives”. It has been noted that lawful behavior as a fact can be motivated and unmotivated, but unmotivation does not mean the absence of a motive, but its unconsciousness. Accordingly, it is necessary to distinguish between conscious in lawful behavior and unconscious in lawful behavior (legal attitudes, habits, skills, legal intuition). The so-called fixed attitudes as an internal prerequisite for lawful behavior are unconscious, while social attitudes can be conscious. Legal attitudes are the basis for legal value orientations. It has been noted that the concept of “sense of law” as an element of motivation of lawful behavior is actually identical to the concept of “legal intuition”, which as a result of legal socialization of a person is at the same time their moral intuition. It also has a connection with the legal mentality of a person.

show abstract

Legal consciousness as a prerequisite for person’s lawful behavior: retrospective view, modern interpretation

Shulha

2022

Pravo bezpeka

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

hi@scite.ai

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Eliminative Materialism and Ordinary Language

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Legal consciousness as a prerequisite for person’s lawful behavior: retrospective view, modern interpretation

Legal consciousness as a prerequisite for person’s lawful behavior: retrospective view, modern interpretation

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About