“…The sulfur cycle in constructed wetlands is intimately intertwined with carbon, nitrogen, and iron cycles, − and has important implications for other aspects of wetland biogeochemistry (e.g., removal of cationic metals). Sulfate is a common constituent of these wastewaters (i.e., typical concentrations range from 10–1000 mg S L –1 ). ,− As the first step of the sulfur cycle, bacterial sulfate reduction occurs in most constructed wetlands where organic carbon is present. ,,, Sulfide produced in wetland sediments can be oxidized back to sulfate by biological or chemical reactions. − , It can also be oxidized to other sulfur species, such as elemental sulfur and thiosulfate, both of which can be microbially disproportionated to sulfate and sulfide. − Because the production of elemental sulfur is substantially faster than its consumption, it can accumulate in wetland sediments . Sulfide can react with ferrous ion (Fe 2+ ) to produce acid volatile sulfide (AVS), which also accumulates in wetland sediments, , where it can undergo further diagenesis to produce pyrite. , Solid-phase sulfur species can be oxidized into sulfate if they encounter electron acceptors (e.g., if nitrate-containing water flows into sulfidic sediments). , As an indispensable component in constructed wetlands, plants can affect the sulfur cycle via assimilatory uptake of sulfate, subsequently incorporating it into organic sulfur compounds. − …”