Operations Research and Decision Aid Methodologies in Traffic and Transportation Management 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-03514-6_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Eliminating Bias Due to the Repeated Measurements Problem in Stated Preference Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to allow for what is termed the repeat observations problem, whereby correlations amongst the errors within individuals' multiple answers lead to the standard errors associated with the coefficients being too low, we have used a jack-knife procedure. This is a repeat sampling method (Cirillo et al, 2000) which provides revised standard errors of coefficient estimates but rarely has any appreciable impact on the coefficient estimates themselves. In all cases, the jack-knife procedure was specified to take 30 samples from the SP data set 1 .…”
Section: Stated Preference Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to allow for what is termed the repeat observations problem, whereby correlations amongst the errors within individuals' multiple answers lead to the standard errors associated with the coefficients being too low, we have used a jack-knife procedure. This is a repeat sampling method (Cirillo et al, 2000) which provides revised standard errors of coefficient estimates but rarely has any appreciable impact on the coefficient estimates themselves. In all cases, the jack-knife procedure was specified to take 30 samples from the SP data set 1 .…”
Section: Stated Preference Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that the models presented in this paper do not include any treatment of the 'repeated measures' property of SP data (e.g., there are no individual level error components). Experience suggests that this is likely to lead to an overstatement (sometime substantially) of the significance of certain parameters, but not to major bias in the central estimates of the parameters themselves; see, for example, Cirillo et al (2000). This should be borne in mind in interpreting the results presented below.…”
Section: Generic Choice Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…388 Results are presented for models with Jack-knife 2 and without (called Ôoriginal modelÕ) Jack-knife 389 estimation. The Jack-knife (see Cirillo et al, 2000) was used here to correct for the repeated 390 measurements bias, which leads to overstated t-ratios and may correct for other specification 391 errors as well. Future work may include using error components for this as well and comparing 392 the outcomes with those of the Jack-knife.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%