2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2334746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elicitable Risk Measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
76
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…if two probability models P 1 , P 2 are such that VaR α X ; Gneiting, 2011 ). Further, VaR is monotone and translation invariant (see properties (a) and (b) from Section 2.3 ) and therefore, we can apply Lemma 2.2 in Bellini and Bignozzi (2015) to obtain that VaR is quasilinear. That is,…”
Section: Robustness Of Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…if two probability models P 1 , P 2 are such that VaR α X ; Gneiting, 2011 ). Further, VaR is monotone and translation invariant (see properties (a) and (b) from Section 2.3 ) and therefore, we can apply Lemma 2.2 in Bellini and Bignozzi (2015) to obtain that VaR is quasilinear. That is,…”
Section: Robustness Of Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [3], expectiles are the only coherent as well as elicitable risk measure. The expectiles were introduced in the context of statistical regression models by Newey and Powell in [24].…”
Section: Elicitability Of Risk Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also examined in a purely mathematical framework in [34]. The elicitability of risk measures is further analyzed in [3] and [35]. Expectiles, as risk measures, were the subject of the works presented in [16], [5], and [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ES is coherent (Acerbi and Tasche, 2002), but nevertheless fails to enjoy elicitability (Gneiting, 2011), another desired property of risk measures for which meaningful point forecasts and forecast performance comparisons are possible. Expectiles are the only risk measure that is both coherent and elicitable (Ziegel, 2016;Bellini and Bignozzi, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%