2018
DOI: 10.5705/ss.202016.0285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Aggregated Expectile Regression by Exponential Weighting

Abstract: Various estimators have been proposed to estimate conditional expectiles, including those from the multiple linear expectile regression, local polynomial expectile regression, boosted expectile regression, and so on. It is common practice that several plausible candidate estimators are fitted and a final estimator is selected from the candidate list. In this article, we advocate the use of an exponential weighting scheme to adaptively aggregate the candidate estimators into a final estimator. We show oracle in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that for quantile regression the loss function is ρ τ false( v false) = v false( τ I false( v < 0 false) false). 15 One can hardly obtain a similar inequality with (2.4) in Gu and Zou 22 since it cannot be justified as strongly convex or L-smooth, while this will provide a succinct course in the follow-up theoretical study. Although Shan and Yang 21 considered a surrogate of ρ τ false( v false), which is nondifferentiable at v = 0, they only contributed the oracle inequality via the surrogate loss.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that for quantile regression the loss function is ρ τ false( v false) = v false( τ I false( v < 0 false) false). 15 One can hardly obtain a similar inequality with (2.4) in Gu and Zou 22 since it cannot be justified as strongly convex or L-smooth, while this will provide a succinct course in the follow-up theoretical study. Although Shan and Yang 21 considered a surrogate of ρ τ false( v false), which is nondifferentiable at v = 0, they only contributed the oracle inequality via the surrogate loss.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an effort to acquire the asymptotic properties of aggregated estimator, we establish the oracle inequalities under particular risk measures. Since the risk bound under the squared error loss can be hardly derived in quantile regression, (Gu and Zou 22 ), we propose a novel smoothing scheme for the quantile check loss function, which supplies the strong convexity and the L-smoothness. Furthermore, we utilize EAW algorithm to additive mixed effect model and construct the estimation of τ-CQF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seminal work of Hansen (2007) has spawned a large recent literature on model averaging. Gu and Zou (2019) recently develop an exponential weighting scheme to construct a model averaging for expectile regressions in fixed dimension. Here, as the number of candidate models to average can diverge with the sample size, we consider a jackknife model averaging (Hansen and Racine, 2012; Lu and Su, 2015, JMA) for expectile regression after screening.…”
Section: Postscreening Model Uncertaintymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the data from previous 20 days as predictors, which aims to handle the dependence in the data. The same strategy was used in Gu and Zou (2019) (Riskτ ) to measure model performance of expectile regression model with level τ . The Riskτ is defined as…”
Section: Sp 500 Index Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use the data from previous 20 days as predictors, which aims to handle the dependence in the data. The same strategy was used in Gu and Zou (2019). On the training set, we fit ER-Boost, KERE, and Expectile NN regression models with each expectile level.…”
Section: Sp 500 Index Datamentioning
confidence: 99%