2016
DOI: 10.1109/jstars.2016.2581482
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevation Changes Inferred From TanDEM-X Data Over the Mont-Blanc Area: Impact of the X-Band Interferometric Bias

Abstract: The TanDEM-X mission allows generation of Digital Elevation Models (DEM) with high potential for glacier monitoring, but the radar penetration into snow and ice remains a main source of uncertainty. In this study, we generate 5 new DEMs of the Mont-Blanc area from TanDEM-X interferometric pairs acquired in 2012/2013. We conducted a multi-temporal analysis of the DEMs in comparison with two high-resolution DEMs obtained from Pléiades stereo satellite images in 2012 and 2013. A vertical precision of 1-3 m of the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
80
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(33 reference statements)
11
80
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass changes reported by Gardelle et al (2013) are most likely too positive as SRTM C-Band penetration depth into snow Berthier et al, 2016) might have been underestimated for the cold and dry snow of accumulation areas (Dehecq et al, 2016 For Golubin Glacier, the inferred mass balance is in close agreement with the geodetic mass change reported by Bolch (2015) (Fig. 12b).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…Mass changes reported by Gardelle et al (2013) are most likely too positive as SRTM C-Band penetration depth into snow Berthier et al, 2016) might have been underestimated for the cold and dry snow of accumulation areas (Dehecq et al, 2016 For Golubin Glacier, the inferred mass balance is in close agreement with the geodetic mass change reported by Bolch (2015) (Fig. 12b).…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…As noted in the Introduction, Melkonian et al ( , 2016 accounted for this by subtracting the C-band and Xband SRTM DEM, assuming no penetration of the X-band DEM (Gardelle et al, 2012). However, X-band penetration can reach several meters into cold snow and firn (e.g., Dehecq et al, 2016;Round et al, 2017). In the case of the SIF, Melkonian et al (2016) assumed no penetration below 1000 m a.s.l.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Melkonian et al ( , 2016 accounted for this penetration by subtracting the simultaneous C-band and X-band SRTM DEMs, assuming no penetration of the X-band DEM (Gardelle et al, 2012), the best available correction at the time of their study. However, this strategy may not be appropriate given that the X-band penetration depth has recently been recognized to reach several meters in cold and dry snow/firn (e.g., Dehecq et al, 2016;Round et al, 2017). In this context, the goal of this brief communication is to recalculate the early-21st-century geodetic mass balances of the Juneau and Stikine icefields using multi-temporal ASTER DEMs, carefully excluding the SRTM DEM to avoid a likely penetration bias.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we measured median and NMAD over off-glacier We also found that NMAD strongly depends on slope in both time periods. Hence, we have not restricted our error analysis up to an arbitrary slope threshold (e.g., 40 • in [15]) given that most of the glaciated area covers slopes below this threshold. Using this approach the error is underestimated for areas steeper than this arbitrary slope threshold and overestimated for gentler areas.…”
Section: Uncertainty Estimatementioning
confidence: 99%