1979
DOI: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1979.tb00781.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated Serum Uric Acid Levels During Treatment With Antihypertensive Drugs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have shown consistent finding that diuretic and beta blocker treatments gives similar changes in kidney function [36, 39]. Increases in urate levels associated with treatment with diuretics (but not potassium-sparing diuretics) and beta blockers have been reported previously [8, 18, 36, 40] and so results here are not unexpected. Bengtsson has recommended monitoring of serum uric acid levels after treatments with diuretics [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other studies have shown consistent finding that diuretic and beta blocker treatments gives similar changes in kidney function [36, 39]. Increases in urate levels associated with treatment with diuretics (but not potassium-sparing diuretics) and beta blockers have been reported previously [8, 18, 36, 40] and so results here are not unexpected. Bengtsson has recommended monitoring of serum uric acid levels after treatments with diuretics [40].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Increases in urate levels associated with treatment with diuretics (but not potassium-sparing diuretics) and beta blockers have been reported previously [8, 18, 36, 40] and so results here are not unexpected. Bengtsson has recommended monitoring of serum uric acid levels after treatments with diuretics [40]. However, in recent times, there has been new debate [4143], as to its significance for both hypertension and cardiovascular disease: “an innocent bystander” or a “central player”?…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%