2020
DOI: 10.7150/jca.46703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elevated double-strand break repair protein RAD50 predicts poor prognosis in hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: A study based on Chinese high-risk cohorts

Abstract: Objective: Increasing evidence indicates that RAD50, which is involved in the repair process of DNA double-strand break (DSB), is also involved in cancer outcomes. However, its role in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the expression of RAD50 and its prognostic value in HBV-related HCC patients. Methods: 107 and 100 patients with HBV-related HCC from the Affiliated Hospital of Youjiang Medical University of Nationalities (AHYM… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The average number of fluorescent foci per nucleus was significantly higher than that of control siRNA-treated cells (Figure 2 B) . To further demonstrate the role of SIRT7 in regulating chromosome stability, we performed RT-qPCR to analyze the effect of SIRT7 knockdown on mRNA levels of five chromosome stability-related genes, namely mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) 31 , aurora kinase A (AURKA) 32 , brrier-to-autointegration factor (BANF1) 33 , RAD50 double strand break repair protein (RAD50) 34 , and breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) 35 . As shown in Figure 2 C , these genes were significantly downregulated when SIRT7 was knocked down, especially MACK, BANF1, and RAD50.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average number of fluorescent foci per nucleus was significantly higher than that of control siRNA-treated cells (Figure 2 B) . To further demonstrate the role of SIRT7 in regulating chromosome stability, we performed RT-qPCR to analyze the effect of SIRT7 knockdown on mRNA levels of five chromosome stability-related genes, namely mitotic centromere-associated kinesin (MCAK) 31 , aurora kinase A (AURKA) 32 , brrier-to-autointegration factor (BANF1) 33 , RAD50 double strand break repair protein (RAD50) 34 , and breast cancer type 1 susceptibility protein (BRCA1) 35 . As shown in Figure 2 C , these genes were significantly downregulated when SIRT7 was knocked down, especially MACK, BANF1, and RAD50.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AURKA and BANF1 are associated with centrosome amplification, mitotic abnormalities, and chromosome instability 32 , 33 . DNA repair protein RAD50 expression causes cell instability, increasing the risk of DNA damage accumulation and malignant transformation 34 . Lose breast cancer type 1/2 susceptibility protein (BRCA1/2) activity causes genomic instability and chromosomal rearrangements 35 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, permeation-related ions allow tumor cells to invade by adjusting the shape and volume of cells. Besides, to adequately assess a biomarker’s ability to predict future risk of neoplastic progression, researchers have explored the prognostic and predictive immunological implications of cancers, such as glioma ( 14 ), liver carcinoma ( 15 ), and renal cell carcinoma ( 16 ). However, specifically, identifying highly sensitive and specific tumor markers is a challenge that needs to be solved for the early diagnosis of pan-cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, improvements in the prognosis of liver cancer remain challenging. The therapeutic effects of first-line HCC drugs such as sorafenib are poor ( Galun et al, 2017 ; Saffo and Taddei, 2019 ), and no prognostic classification and markers have been identified to provide guidance for personalized treatment ( Liu et al, 2020a ; Zhao et al, 2021a ; Zhao et al, 2021b ). Therefore, a new treatment strategy is required to predict the prognosis of liver cancer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%