2020
DOI: 10.1002/lno.11559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elements of lake macrophyte metacommunity structure: Global variation and community‐environment relationships

Abstract: Documenting the patterns of biological diversity on Earth has always been a central challenge in macroecology and biogeography. However, we are only beginning to generate an understanding of the global patterns and determinants of macrophyte diversity. Here, we studied large‐scale variation and community‐environment relationships of lake macrophytes along climatic and geographical gradients using regional data from six continents. We applied statistical routines typically used in the context of metacommunity s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on a previous study on global variation in community similarity of lake plants (Alahuhta et al, 2017), we also expected (H2) that within–ecoregion and across–ecoregion heterogeneity would be caused by species replacements rather than by differences in species richness. Similarly, we predicted (H3) that climatic forcing would explain a great deal of variation in the robustness of freshwater plant ecoregions (Heino, 2011; Chappuis et al, 2012; Alahuhta et al, 2021, 2020; García–Girón et al, 2020a, 2020b), with topography, Pleistocene Ice Age legacies, human footprint, water alkalinity, availability of inland waterbodies and the surface area of individual regions playing an important supplementary role (Lacoul & Freedman, 2006; Chappuis et al, 2014; Iversen et al, 2019; Murphy et al, 2019, 2020). Finally, we hypothesised (H4) that ecoregions would be a more robust and useful classification for floating–leaved and submerged plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Based on a previous study on global variation in community similarity of lake plants (Alahuhta et al, 2017), we also expected (H2) that within–ecoregion and across–ecoregion heterogeneity would be caused by species replacements rather than by differences in species richness. Similarly, we predicted (H3) that climatic forcing would explain a great deal of variation in the robustness of freshwater plant ecoregions (Heino, 2011; Chappuis et al, 2012; Alahuhta et al, 2021, 2020; García–Girón et al, 2020a, 2020b), with topography, Pleistocene Ice Age legacies, human footprint, water alkalinity, availability of inland waterbodies and the surface area of individual regions playing an important supplementary role (Lacoul & Freedman, 2006; Chappuis et al, 2014; Iversen et al, 2019; Murphy et al, 2019, 2020). Finally, we hypothesised (H4) that ecoregions would be a more robust and useful classification for floating–leaved and submerged plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…2016; García‐Girón et al . 2020a). There was a relatively wide variation in the Z ‐scores of coherence, the Z ‐scores of range turnover, and the index of range boundary clumping among dinosaur clades and spatial scales (Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2010) and García‐Girón et al . (2020a). MI , Morisita's Index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the extent to which biotic disturbance (invasive species), anthropogenic disturbance (land use), and the abiotic environment (water quality) interact with each another and with space to drive patterns of species composition is not understood. Metacommunities of aquatic plants generally display a Clementsian pattern in many regions of the globe (García‐Girón et al., 2020), but how functional or phylogenetic groups of aquatic plants correspond to such structure is largely unknown, despite evidence that patterns of β diversity relate to taxonomic, functional, and phylogenic attributes of species (García‐Girón et al., 2019). Consequently, we evaluated patterns and processes in a metacommunity of native aquatic plants to comprehensively address three overarching goals: (1) determining the role of invasive aquatic plants in affecting the metacommunity; (2) unravelling the roles of space and three subcategories of local environmental disturbance (abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic) on species composition; and (3) assessing if functional or phylogenetic groups of native aquatic plants are associated with metacommunity structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%