2020
DOI: 10.1080/1046560x.2020.1789267
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elementary Science Teachers’ Sense-Making with Learning to Implement Engineering Design and Its Impact on Students’ Science Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This similarity can be attributed to the close socioeconomic levels of the students or their taking lessons from the same teachers. This situation is seen as a situation that has emerged in many experimental studies (Capobianco, Radloff & Lehman, 2021;Kırıcı & Bakırcı, 2021). Moreover, the experimental group's post-test scores were different from comparison group with respect to engineering knowledge levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This similarity can be attributed to the close socioeconomic levels of the students or their taking lessons from the same teachers. This situation is seen as a situation that has emerged in many experimental studies (Capobianco, Radloff & Lehman, 2021;Kırıcı & Bakırcı, 2021). Moreover, the experimental group's post-test scores were different from comparison group with respect to engineering knowledge levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These findings are consistent with the benefits of instruction featuring driving questions (e.g., Krajcik et al, 1994; Weizman et al, 2010) based on anchoring phenomena (Thompson et al, 2016; Windschitl et al, 2008), which motivate students' engagement in a range of science practices. In instruction that coherently integrates science and engineering, these anchoring science phenomena are further contextualized within design problems, compelling teachers to revisit design problem definitions throughout instruction to promote student engagement, self‐monitoring, and conceptual connections across disciplines (e.g., Capobianco et al, 2021). Findings are also consistent with research on responsive teaching in engineering settings where pedagogical decisions are based on what the students are saying and doing (e.g., Watkins et al, 2018; Wendell et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ability of science museums to provide in-service science and mathematics teachers with extended PD is vitally important for the inclusion of engineering education in K-12 schools in the U.S. Despite the inclusion of engineering concepts in the widely adopted Next Generation Science Standard (NGSS), most K-12 teacher education programs still do not include engineering education content or courses, which leads to low teacher confidence in including engineering concepts in their instructional practice [47,48]. Because of their ability to deliver quality, adaptable PD, science museums are an underutilized mechanism for addressing these issues in teacher education.…”
Section: Informal Learning Institutions As Resources For Educatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%