1982
DOI: 10.1016/0036-9748(82)90398-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Elemental partitioning as a function of heat treatment in an FeSiVC dual phase steel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because manganese is segregated in the band structure, a considerable amount of austenite can transform to martensite during the cooling following the isothermal treatment, due to the increased hardenability of austenite. [17,18] Such a microstructure is more brittle than the one wherein hard phases are evenly distributed overall, and, thus, the formation of the band structure does not help to enhance the elongation. Consequently, the manganese content should be controlled at a lower amount in order to restrict the formation of the intercritically annealed for 5 minutes at 840 ЊC, at which the fraction ratio of ferrite to austenite is about 40:60, and then isothermally treated at 465 ЊC, 450 ЊC, and 430 ЊC for 1 and 10 minutes, respectively.…”
Section: B Microstructural Variation Vs Alloying Elements and Heat Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because manganese is segregated in the band structure, a considerable amount of austenite can transform to martensite during the cooling following the isothermal treatment, due to the increased hardenability of austenite. [17,18] Such a microstructure is more brittle than the one wherein hard phases are evenly distributed overall, and, thus, the formation of the band structure does not help to enhance the elongation. Consequently, the manganese content should be controlled at a lower amount in order to restrict the formation of the intercritically annealed for 5 minutes at 840 ЊC, at which the fraction ratio of ferrite to austenite is about 40:60, and then isothermally treated at 465 ЊC, 450 ЊC, and 430 ЊC for 1 and 10 minutes, respectively.…”
Section: B Microstructural Variation Vs Alloying Elements and Heat Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher fraction of retained austenite in the intercritical during plastic deformation, they do not contribute to ductility enhancement. As they can also increase the hardenability of cold-rolled steels, [17,18] it is likely that the microstructure turns into a structure mainly consisting of ferrite and martensite due to the martensitic transformation of austenite during cooling after the isothermal treatment. In this case, the eventual fraction of retained austenite is reduced, together with the occurrence of the deformation behavior of a dual-phase structure; thus, a higher strength can be expected but not an improved elongation.…”
Section: B Microstructural Variation Vs Alloying Elements and Heat Tmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system is also well characterized in terms of both microstructure and mechanical properties [13,14,18,25,44,45]. In addition, it was shown that a wide range of morphologies and mechanical properties could be produced from a single alloy through appropriate thermal processing [14,45], thus allowing for a more thorough and consistent investigation with fewer changes in alloy composition.…”
Section: Contfnfsmentioning
confidence: 99%