2005
DOI: 10.1126/science.1120385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrowetting in Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract: We demonstrate reversible wetting and filling of open single-wall carbon nanotubes with mercury by means of electrocapillary pressure originating from the application of a potential across an individual nanotube in contact with a mercury drop. Wetting improves the conductance in both metallic and semiconducting nanotube probes by decreasing contact resistance and forming a mercury nanowire inside the nanotube. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborate the electrocapillarity-driven filling process and provide … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
95
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[22][23][24] This is an important characteristic that potentially allows electrocapillary manipulation and construction of highperformance imbibition systems.A CNT sponge is a macroscopic assembly of nanotubes with high porosity, electrical conductivity, and mechanical fl exibility. [ 25 ] Here, we show that these CNT sponges could serve as an electrocapillary imbiber to achieve effi cient water imbibition under low voltages and on-off switchability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] This is an important characteristic that potentially allows electrocapillary manipulation and construction of highperformance imbibition systems.A CNT sponge is a macroscopic assembly of nanotubes with high porosity, electrical conductivity, and mechanical fl exibility. [ 25 ] Here, we show that these CNT sponges could serve as an electrocapillary imbiber to achieve effi cient water imbibition under low voltages and on-off switchability.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications in our system would be resulted from tube end effects, 19 structural perfectness, and chirality of CNTs, and possible electrowetting effect. 20,21 Because of the compensation between different factors and their minor effects on this experiment, 19À21 it is believed not to change the order of magnitude for the obtained results. Hence the obtained enhancement and slip length values should reflect the intrinsic nanofluidics of water in CNTs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanofluidic experiments were performed on stand-alone nanotubes grown with an encapsulated fluid, on nanotubes vertically grown on a substrate, on nanotubes mounted at the end of the tip of an AFM, and on nanotubes inserted across a polymer film. [44][45][46][47][48] However, a planar integration would be more convenient. Karnik et al from Berkeley deposited and patterned a silicon dioxide layer on nanotubes dispersed on a glass substrate.…”
Section: Alternative Nanolithography Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%