2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.2982468
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic Waves Observed At and Near the Solar Wind Termination Shock By Voyager 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We suggest that alternatively the enhanced waves seen in the PWS data in event A may be due to a two‐stream ion instability caused by the interaction between the convective bulk heliosheath (HS) plasma ions and a population of high‐energy ions (HEIs). This interpretation is consistent with the simulation of Gurnett et al [2008] suggesting the enhanced PWS signals near TS‐3 (event B) in Figure 1 were due to two interacting ion beams.…”
Section: Motivationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…We suggest that alternatively the enhanced waves seen in the PWS data in event A may be due to a two‐stream ion instability caused by the interaction between the convective bulk heliosheath (HS) plasma ions and a population of high‐energy ions (HEIs). This interpretation is consistent with the simulation of Gurnett et al [2008] suggesting the enhanced PWS signals near TS‐3 (event B) in Figure 1 were due to two interacting ion beams.…”
Section: Motivationsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…2 shows the modeled and measured solar wind proton density. The interaction of the EEls with the bulk convective plasma could give rise to a two stream plasma instabilityconsistent with that modeled in Gumett et al [12] associated with the ramp of the third V2 TS crossing -producing the enhanced PWS signals observed in Event A in Fig. While this value is low, comparison between the simulation results and the data shows that generally the model captures the data trends: it simulates the big density increases ~ Day 298, after Day 300, ~ Day 305, -Day 309, after Day 310, ~ Day 315, at Day 319, and ~ Day 325.…”
Section: D Mhd Hhms-pi Resultssupporting
confidence: 72%
“…For the entire 50-day interval shown the re is 0.78. The enhanced PWS signals labeled "Event A" are intriquing since Gumett et al [12] suggested that they could be associated with a V2 TS crossing but the PLS [14] and magnetometer [15] data did not appear to support this association. Here again our further analyses of these differences between the simulation and the data may provide physical insights into the processes responsible for the observations -in this case the cooling of the solar wind.…”
Section: D Mhd Hhms-pi Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations