1978
DOI: 10.1080/00022470.1978.10470564
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic Precipitation Technology: A Different Viewpoint

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the difference is to use the continuous approach without the need for threshold values in voltage and current. Other researchers are usually focusing on improving the precipitation efficiency such as Fraunhofer UMSICHT [19] or focus on the theoretical calculation of the ESP performance as E. C. Potter [20]. The approach will be explained further in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, the difference is to use the continuous approach without the need for threshold values in voltage and current. Other researchers are usually focusing on improving the precipitation efficiency such as Fraunhofer UMSICHT [19] or focus on the theoretical calculation of the ESP performance as E. C. Potter [20]. The approach will be explained further in the next section.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The important effects of voltage, particle size, and carrier gas additives clearly emerge from the extended Deutsch equation and the proper value of pilot plant testing has been realized (Potter, 1978 SCA=the specific collection area in s/m 7]s=the particle collection efficiency at corona onset in %.…”
Section: Extended Deutsch Equationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental results are, then, fitted with both the modified Deutsch equation made by Matts-Ohnfeldt (1963), and the extended Deutsch equation made by E. C. Potter (1978) to evaluate the effect of the particle characteristics and the operational conditions on the particle collection efficiency of the electrostatic precipitator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At the same operating conditions, the smaller the geometric standard deviation ofan applied particle size distribution, the higher the collection efficiency; the larger the mass median diameter, the higher the collection efficiency [13]. Practically [17,18,19,20,21] models have been proposed. For a given migration velocity and SCA, the nonideal factors which reduce the collection efficiency of a precipitator are gas velocity distribution, gas sneakage, and rapping reentrainment [12].,…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%