2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c03481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrostatic Field-Driven Supercurrent Suppression in Ionic-Gated Metallic Superconducting Nanotransistors

Abstract: Recent experiments have shown the possibility of tuning the transport properties of metallic nanosized superconductors through a gate voltage. These results renewed the longstanding debate on the interaction between electrostatic fields and superconductivity. Indeed, different works suggested competing mechanisms as the cause of the effect: an unconventional electric field-effect or quasiparticle injection. Here, we provide conclusive evidence for the electrostatic-field-driven control of the supercurrent in m… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without any further assumption or fitting parameter, we found that: i) consistent with an EFT approach, parametrically small corrections to the electric permittivity are sufficient to drive a phase transition and to match the measured behavior of the critical current as a function of the applied electric field, ii) the qualitative behaviour is independent of the charge sign of the electrodes, iii) the critical temperature is not appreciably affected by the electric field applied, iv) the effect vanishes when the thickness of the sample is increased over several coherence lengths. All these predictions are both qualitatively and quantitatively in agreement with the experiments [2,5,6,12,[16][17][18][19]. Additionally, we have proposed a way to further test our theoretical model through elec-tron tunneling, highlighting the features that could be detected in these kind of experiments.…”
Section: Metalsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Without any further assumption or fitting parameter, we found that: i) consistent with an EFT approach, parametrically small corrections to the electric permittivity are sufficient to drive a phase transition and to match the measured behavior of the critical current as a function of the applied electric field, ii) the qualitative behaviour is independent of the charge sign of the electrodes, iii) the critical temperature is not appreciably affected by the electric field applied, iv) the effect vanishes when the thickness of the sample is increased over several coherence lengths. All these predictions are both qualitatively and quantitatively in agreement with the experiments [2,5,6,12,[16][17][18][19]. Additionally, we have proposed a way to further test our theoretical model through elec-tron tunneling, highlighting the features that could be detected in these kind of experiments.…”
Section: Metalsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…These include electric-field induced spin-orbit polarization [13], Rashba-like surface effects [14] and the excitation of an exotic superconducting state due to Schwinger-like effects [15]. All these proposals lead to a weakening of superconductivity but they do not fully explain other experimental results [2,12,[16][17][18][19] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the recent years, suppression of supercurrent by applying a voltage to a gate electrode in the vicinity of superconducting metallic nanowire has attracted much attention as a promising building block for highly scalable superconducting switches . In some works, the effect is attributed to the large electric field (10 8 V/m) at the superconducting surface [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21], which distorts the superconducting state and leads to the quenching of the superconductivity [29][30][31][32][33]. Other studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] reported a correlation between the gate controlled supercurrent (GCS) and the leakage current flowing between the gate and the superconducting device.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ionic gating technique is a very powerful tool to tune the properties of a large variety of materials, including high-carrier density systems such as metals [1][2][3][4][5][6], BCS superconductors [7][8][9][10][11], thin flakes of metallic transitionmetal dichalcogenides [12][13][14] and iron-based superconductors [15][16][17][18][19][20][21] using a field-effect transistor (FET) configuration. In principle, the basic mechanism by which it operates is electrostatic and fully reversible: when the interface between an electrolyte and the material under study is polarized by a gate voltage, the mobile ions accumulate in the so-called electric double layer (EDL) and build up electric fields up to ∼ 100 times larger than those achievable in standard solid-dielectric FETs [22,23].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%