2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.07.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrospun nanostructured polystyrene as a new coating material for solid-phase microextraction: Application to separation of multipesticides from honey samples

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The figures of merit of the developed MSPME combined with HPLC method were compared with recently published literature for the extraction and determination of diazinon and malathion (Table ) by chromatographic method. As it is observed, the proposed method exhibits higher preconcentration factors compared to the other extraction methods so that its detection limit is even lower than separation methods combined with more sensitive and expensive instrument such as GC–MS or HPLC–MS/MS . The precision and the linear dynamic range of the method is also comparable to the previously reported methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The figures of merit of the developed MSPME combined with HPLC method were compared with recently published literature for the extraction and determination of diazinon and malathion (Table ) by chromatographic method. As it is observed, the proposed method exhibits higher preconcentration factors compared to the other extraction methods so that its detection limit is even lower than separation methods combined with more sensitive and expensive instrument such as GC–MS or HPLC–MS/MS . The precision and the linear dynamic range of the method is also comparable to the previously reported methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
“…However, due to the very low concentration of OPPs in environmental samples as well as the matrices interferences, their direct determination by chromatographic methods, such as HPLC and GC, is not possible and a separation/preconcentration step is often necessary. Several pretreatment methods including cloud point extraction [5], dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction , headspace solid‐phase microextraction , SPE , and SPME have been reported for the separation, enrichment, and sample cleanup of the OPPs residue in various matrices. SPE and SPME are the most extensively used sample pretreatment method with the advantages of short extraction time, safety, low consumption of organic solvent, simplicity, and possibility of achieving high enrichment factor .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering these various advantages and disadvantages, methods for analyzing residual pesticides in honey have been continuously developed. However, in many countries and public organizations, SPE is the mainly employed authorized method for the analysis of residual pesticide in honey …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in many countries and public organizations, SPE is the mainly employed authorized method for the analysis of residual pesticide in honey. [11][12][13][14][15][16] The QuEChERS method has good concentration and purification effects and showed a LOQ of 5 μg/kg using the multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) mode of GC/MS. 9 In addition, the extraction time is short (within 20 min) and the extraction process is simple and convenient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6] Triazole fungicides as the ourishing new generation of pesticides are widely applied to grain crops, vegetables, and fruits. The residue can not only stay in the edible parts of crops, but also be transferred to other agricultural products through food chain transmission.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%