2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrospun nanofiber from various source of expanded polystyrene (EPS) waste and their characterization as potential air filter media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The filter thickness can be controlled by the time of collection of the fiber and the distance between the needle and the collector [34,40,[57][58][59]. In this sense, the thickness must be controlled so as not to compromise the air filtration process, that is, the collection efficiency of the nanoparticles and the filter pressure drop [58]. In the present study, it was observed that the produced filter media had slightly different thicknesses (see in Table 2); for all samples, the collection time was 6 h and the distance from the needle to the collector was 10 cm.…”
Section: Characterization Of Microfibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The filter thickness can be controlled by the time of collection of the fiber and the distance between the needle and the collector [34,40,[57][58][59]. In this sense, the thickness must be controlled so as not to compromise the air filtration process, that is, the collection efficiency of the nanoparticles and the filter pressure drop [58]. In the present study, it was observed that the produced filter media had slightly different thicknesses (see in Table 2); for all samples, the collection time was 6 h and the distance from the needle to the collector was 10 cm.…”
Section: Characterization Of Microfibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,[55][56][57][58][59][60] Furthermore, expanded polystyrene (EPS) waste was successfully used for the production of air filters by electrospinning. [61] In addition to the material type and additives, which can be used to functionalize the formed fibers, [12] process variables such as applied voltage, flow rate, type of collector, and distance between needle tip and collector were adjusted to tailor the final fiber properties such as diameter, length, porosity, pore size, and morphology. [62] For instance, uniform polymeric PBI nanofiber filters were obtained by electrospinning with a single solvent, see Figure 4b, [51] whereas the usage of a mixed solvent system allows producing polymer-rich and polymer-lean phases within the fiber, resulting in porous bead-on-string PLA fiber filters, as shown in Figure 4c.…”
Section: Electrospinningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the samples from NFM10 to NFM16 have the equivalent basis weight, they displayed different pressure drops resulting from the change in the packing density (Figure 3b). The trade-off parameter between the pressure drop and filtration efficiency, known as quality factor (QF), was used to evaluate the overall filtration performance (22,23). The QF was calculated by the formula as follows:…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%