2014
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094605
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological Responses to Alcohol Cues Are Not Associated with Pavlovian-to-Instrumental Transfer in Social Drinkers

Abstract: Pavlovian to Instrumental Transfer (PIT) refers to the behavioral phenomenon of increased instrumental responding for a reinforcer when in the presence of Pavlovian conditioned stimuli that were separately paired with that reinforcer. PIT effects may play an important role in substance use disorders, but little is known about the brain mechanisms that underlie these effects in alcohol consumers. We report behavioral and electroencephalographic (EEG) data from a group of social drinkers (n = 31) who performed a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
48
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
8
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the cueing effect was entirely abolished in participants who reported no expectancy that the cues signalled the effective R-O relation. This also replicates the sub-group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Propositional cue-control 24 analysis of Hogarth et al (2014). The only divergence was the failure of instructions to significantly reduce participants' self-reported expectancies that cues signalled the effective R-O relation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, the cueing effect was entirely abolished in participants who reported no expectancy that the cues signalled the effective R-O relation. This also replicates the sub-group 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 Propositional cue-control 24 analysis of Hogarth et al (2014). The only divergence was the failure of instructions to significantly reduce participants' self-reported expectancies that cues signalled the effective R-O relation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The only divergence was the failure of instructions to significantly reduce participants' self-reported expectancies that cues signalled the effective R-O relation. This discrepancy may be due to insensitivity of the continuous self-report measure in the current experiment compared to binary measure obtained in Hogarth et al (2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We focused our analysis on an approach that has been widely used in psychophysiology: the examination of topographic changes in EEG activity (cf. Brunet, Murray, & Michel, 2011;Laganaro, Valente, & Perret, 2012;Martinovic et al, 2014;Murray, Brunet, & Michel, 2008). This approach considers whole-scalp EEG activity elicited by a stimulus as a finite set of alternating spatially stable activation patterns, which reflect a succession of information processing stages.…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Left-handed individuals were also excluded from the experiment. The subjects were instructed not to use tobacco, coffee 15 or alcoholic drinks 16 10 hours before the test because these substances may influence cortical activation recorded by QEEG brain mapping. 17,18 The study was approved by the ethics committee of Veiga de Almeida University and complied with the ethical standards of the Declaration of Helsinki.…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%