2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.07.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological correlates of visual identity negative priming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
2
32
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our negative findings of no group differences in P1 and N1-associated with early rapid processing of spatial stimuli and attentional focus and a discrimination, respectively (Taylor, 2002;Frings and Groh-Bordin, 2007)-are in conflict with the suggestion that OCD patients may have an early attentional capture deficit (Thomas et al, 2013). However, it is important to note that, in the task of Thomas et al (2013) it is not necessary to inhibit the reading and all participants needed to elaborate the meaning.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our negative findings of no group differences in P1 and N1-associated with early rapid processing of spatial stimuli and attentional focus and a discrimination, respectively (Taylor, 2002;Frings and Groh-Bordin, 2007)-are in conflict with the suggestion that OCD patients may have an early attentional capture deficit (Thomas et al, 2013). However, it is important to note that, in the task of Thomas et al (2013) it is not necessary to inhibit the reading and all participants needed to elaborate the meaning.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…P1, N1, and P2 components may indicate relatively early sensory stages of information processing. For example, the P1 is presumed to be associated with early visual processing (Thomas et al, 2013), N1 is thought to reflect attentional focus on targets and a discrimination process within the focus of attention (Frings and Groh-Bordin, 2007), and P2 has been associated with low-level word processing (Coles and Rugg, 1995;Crowley and Colrain, 2004). N2 and P3 components reflect the capture of attention during later, higher-level cognition including inhibitory and memoryupdating processes; and P3 in particular appears to be associated with stimulus evaluation (Dai and Feng, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Mayr and Buchner (2007) concluded that the correlates of identity NP reflect rather late components of stimulus evaluation. However, in a couple of recent studies, an enhanced N200 component was observed in the IR trials of a NP Flanker task (Frings & Groh-Bordin, 2007;Hinojosa, Pozo, MĂ©ndez-BĂ©rtolo, & Luna, 2009). This significant effect only occurred when participants also displayed the behavioral correlates of NP and was therefore functionally linked to NP (Groh-Bordin & Frings, 2009).…”
Section: What Are the Neural And Electrophysiological Correlates Of Np?mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In the literature exists a broad diversity between identity and location NP for both behavioral and neurophysiological data (e.g. Connelly & Hasher, 1993;Tipper, Bourque, Anderson & Brehaut, 1989;Mayr, Niedeggen, Buchner & Pietrowsky, 2003;Egner & Hirsch, 2005;Vink, Kahn, Raemaekers & Ramsey, 2005;Gibbons, 2006;Gibbons, Rammsayer & Stahl, 2006;Kathmann, Bogdahn & Endrass 2006;Ruge & Naumann, 2006;Wright et al, 2006;Frings & Groh-Bordin, 2007;Krueger, Fischer, Heinecke & Hagendorf, 2007). For example it could be shown that schizophrenic patients show no or reduced location NP whereas identity NP is not impaired (Hoenig, Hochrein, MĂĽller & Wagner, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%