2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of gender differences in the modulation of distraction by the emotional context

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
30
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, in the negative emotional context, response times were longer than in the neutral context which implicates that the novel sounds effectively caused distraction and the emotionally negative context effectively disrupted performance. However, the emotional context did not significantly modulate the electrophysiological response to auditory distraction, contrasting with previous studies Garcia-Garcia et al, 2008) which found an enhancement of the visual P300 for emotionally negative stimuli . Nevertheless, in studies using faces, some authors have found visual P300 enhancement by fearful faces (Luo et al, 2010), while others reported no changes in P300 amplitude (Balconi and Lucchiari, 2005) as in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Additionally, in the negative emotional context, response times were longer than in the neutral context which implicates that the novel sounds effectively caused distraction and the emotionally negative context effectively disrupted performance. However, the emotional context did not significantly modulate the electrophysiological response to auditory distraction, contrasting with previous studies Garcia-Garcia et al, 2008) which found an enhancement of the visual P300 for emotionally negative stimuli . Nevertheless, in studies using faces, some authors have found visual P300 enhancement by fearful faces (Luo et al, 2010), while others reported no changes in P300 amplitude (Balconi and Lucchiari, 2005) as in the present study.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Thus, while both men and women become consciously aware and capable of cognitive processing of stimuli at equal points in time following stimulus presentation, women apparently give greater attention to stimuli at a conscious level, particularly with emotional stimuli. This may be why under certain experimental conditions, women's P300, the portion of an evoked potential considered to refl ect cognitive activity, is modulated by emotional context to a greater extent than men's (Garcia-Garcia, Dominguez-Borras, SanMiguel, & Escera, 2008 ). Emotional contagion studies reveal similar results.…”
Section: Neuroanatomical Findingssupporting
confidence: 54%
“…These studies, along with the current observation of deficits of attentional inhibition in women, suggest that poor attentional control might be an important predictor of excessive alcohol use for women. Indeed, women have been shown to be more easily distracted by novel stimuli, and to be more sensitive to the influence of attentional cues (Bayliss et al, 2005; Garcia-Garcia et al, 2008; Stoet, 2010). As such, it is possible that alcohol-related cues might be more difficult for female drinkers to ignore, and this might be an important contributing factor for excessive alcohol consumption in women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%