1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf01052613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electrophysiological analysis of corticofugal influences on preoptic neurons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be mentioned that we detected a certain gradient in inhibitory drive, which we consider in the phylogenetic aspect [14,15]. The minimum proportion of inhibitory responses was observed when the neopaleocortex (the proreal gyrus) was stimulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be mentioned that we detected a certain gradient in inhibitory drive, which we consider in the phylogenetic aspect [14,15]. The minimum proportion of inhibitory responses was observed when the neopaleocortex (the proreal gyrus) was stimulated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As was already mentioned, these were the proreal and cingular cortices, cortical regions of the pyriform lobe, and hippocampus [6,30,32,33,36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Series of stimuli applied to the cortical structures, in addition to changes in the mean frequency of the IA (its enhancement or inhibition), which we described earlier in detail [29,[31][32][33][34][35], can also, in many cases, evoke alterations of the temporal structure (distribution) of ISI. In the RPO neurons, responses of two types were most frequently generated after serial cortical stimulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation