2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.elerap.2017.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic word-of-mouth, box office revenue and social media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first set of features capture information about movies that is commonly considered in academic studies on movies (Baek et al 2017; Eliashberg, Anita, and Leenders 2006; Ghiassi, Lio, and Moon 2015; Litman and Ahn 1998; Narayan and Kadiyali 2015; Ravid 1999; Sharda and Delen 2006; Zufryden 1996). For each movie in each study, we collect the average critic rating (from Metacritic); the average user score (from Metacritic); the production budget (from IMDb, adjusted for inflation using the tool available at http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl); the maximum number of screens on which the movie was shown in the United States throughout the course of its run in theaters, known as “widest release” (available from Box Office Mojo; boxofficemojo.com), for which we also include a square term; the domestic box office performance (from IMDb, adjusted for inflation using the tool available at http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl); the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rating (from IMDb) 10 ; the movie’s run time in minutes (from Box Office Mojo); a dummy variable equal to 1 if the movie was a sequel; the degree of competition faced by the movie at the time of its release, captured by two dummy variables (following Sharda and Delen [2006]): a “high competition” variable is equal to 1 for movies released in the months of June and November, and a “medium competition” is equal to 1 for movies released in the months of May, July, and December (release month was obtained from IMDb); “star power,” measured as the power of the highest rated star in the movie at the time of its release (following Elberse and Eliashberg 2003), where power is measured using the STARmeter rating provided by IMDb; a measure of activity on Twitter, based on the publicly available MovieTweetings database of Dooms, De Pessemier, and Martens (2013) (we use the total number of tweets about each movie in the database as a cumulative measure of activity); the time elapsed between the release of the movie in theatres (obtained from IMDb) and the release of the DVD (obtained from Amazon); and the sales rank of the movie’s DVD as of December 2017 (obtained from Amazon).…”
Section: Using Guided Lda Features As Input Into Predictive Consumer mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first set of features capture information about movies that is commonly considered in academic studies on movies (Baek et al 2017; Eliashberg, Anita, and Leenders 2006; Ghiassi, Lio, and Moon 2015; Litman and Ahn 1998; Narayan and Kadiyali 2015; Ravid 1999; Sharda and Delen 2006; Zufryden 1996). For each movie in each study, we collect the average critic rating (from Metacritic); the average user score (from Metacritic); the production budget (from IMDb, adjusted for inflation using the tool available at http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl); the maximum number of screens on which the movie was shown in the United States throughout the course of its run in theaters, known as “widest release” (available from Box Office Mojo; boxofficemojo.com), for which we also include a square term; the domestic box office performance (from IMDb, adjusted for inflation using the tool available at http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl); the Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) rating (from IMDb) 10 ; the movie’s run time in minutes (from Box Office Mojo); a dummy variable equal to 1 if the movie was a sequel; the degree of competition faced by the movie at the time of its release, captured by two dummy variables (following Sharda and Delen [2006]): a “high competition” variable is equal to 1 for movies released in the months of June and November, and a “medium competition” is equal to 1 for movies released in the months of May, July, and December (release month was obtained from IMDb); “star power,” measured as the power of the highest rated star in the movie at the time of its release (following Elberse and Eliashberg 2003), where power is measured using the STARmeter rating provided by IMDb; a measure of activity on Twitter, based on the publicly available MovieTweetings database of Dooms, De Pessemier, and Martens (2013) (we use the total number of tweets about each movie in the database as a cumulative measure of activity); the time elapsed between the release of the movie in theatres (obtained from IMDb) and the release of the DVD (obtained from Amazon); and the sales rank of the movie’s DVD as of December 2017 (obtained from Amazon).…”
Section: Using Guided Lda Features As Input Into Predictive Consumer mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Online feedback is regarded as an important information tool to help consumers understand the quality of services and products and interact with sellers, service providers, and other consumers [14-17]. With the development of telemedicine and telemedicine services, online feedback has been widely applied in the telemedicine markets [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We designed a web crawler by Python with Scrapy, which captures these reviews, a total 60,012 reviews from 95 movies between 4 November 2013 and 26 July 2018. Our movie volume was commonly used in previous works [30,57]. Figure 1 shows an example of an audience member's review on IMDb.…”
Section: Audience Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%