2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-020-04937-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic word-of-mouth effects on studio performance leveraging attention-based model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of computing UGC using a combined approach provides new opportunities for studios' business models. Consumer sentiment through UGC remains an important communication channel (Liu et al, 2020). It can also be applied to natural language processing, computer vision, and other artificial intelligence technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of computing UGC using a combined approach provides new opportunities for studios' business models. Consumer sentiment through UGC remains an important communication channel (Liu et al, 2020). It can also be applied to natural language processing, computer vision, and other artificial intelligence technologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gellerstedt and Arvemo (2019) explored the difference between the impact of e-WOM and the one of traditional WOM. Liu et al (2020) developed hierarchical attention network models. By integrating the attention mechanism into deep learning models, they found that e-WOM could provide excellent insights into the film market.…”
Section: Conflicts Of Interestmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the difference between implicit and explicit meanings in consumer reviews (Liu et al , 2020), the ambiguity and “context mismatch” between text and images leads to business managers' erroneous judgment of consumer sentiment. Although many researchers have analyzed customer reviews to reveal customer sentiment (Alaei et al , 2019), no one has investigated the affective differences between comment text and photographs, particularly the effect of sarcasm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%