1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-6779(98)00222-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic transport in carbon nanotube ropes and mats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
47
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The probable reason is higher MWCNT volume fraction and compactness of filtered MWCNT network with respect to powdery CNT layer investigated in [5]. The best description of the data in Fig.15 is obtained by the series heterogeneous model when the resistance is described as the sum of metallic (MWCNT are regarded as metallic conductors) and barrier portions of conduction path [21][22][23] …”
Section: Mwcnt Network and Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The probable reason is higher MWCNT volume fraction and compactness of filtered MWCNT network with respect to powdery CNT layer investigated in [5]. The best description of the data in Fig.15 is obtained by the series heterogeneous model when the resistance is described as the sum of metallic (MWCNT are regarded as metallic conductors) and barrier portions of conduction path [21][22][23] …”
Section: Mwcnt Network and Contact Resistancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Moreover, for SWCNTs with tangled regions the nonmetallic term can be described by proposed for variable range hopping conductivity Mott's law (1), indicating localization of charge carriers and hopping transport instead of fluctuation-induced tunneling (Kaiser et al, 1999). We assume that in our samples the localization effects and the resulting hopping transport can be essential only at very low temperatures where the rapid rise of the resistance is observed as the temperature decrease.…”
Section: Electrical and Magnetotransport Properties Of Carbon Nanotubmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The behavior of relatively sparse transparent networks is most relevant for transparent contacts [70][71][72]. These works have identified several factors including network density [70,73], interactions between tubes or bundles [70,73], bundle length [71], and doping [41] as having a strong influence on network conductivity.…”
Section: Electrical Properties Of Swcnt Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%