Abstract:The proportion of items spontaneously relayed increased from 54% without the checklist to 98% when using the checklist (p < 0.0001). More than 90% of participants felt that the checklist increased handover efficiency and communication skills. All participants stated that the handovers were more thorough with the checklist and that they would incorporate it into their daily practice. Intraoperative anaesthesiology handovers are especially challenging because of concurrent management of the patient DISCUSSION: W… Show more
“…26–28 Three studies were described as quality improvement projects 10,26,29 (Table 3). All prospective studies used a prepost design––3 studies included a matched control, 26,28,29 2 studies did not have a matched control, 10,20 and Jayaswal et al 27 did not report on the details of their control arm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11,12,18,19,[23][24][25] Six studies used a nonrandomized prospective design to evaluate the effects of specific handoff tools on process-based outcomes such as clinician satisfaction with tool use, effectiveness of information transfer using the tool, and tool satisfaction (see section Prospective Studies of Intraoperative Handoff Tools). 10,20,[26][27][28][29] Retrospective Cohort Studies of Intraoperative Handoffs These studies included a total of 680,855 surgeries with 139,426 of these having at least 1 handoff (20.47%). Most of the included retrospective studies (n = 6 of 8) were conducted at a single academic medical center 11,12,18,19,23,24 ; 1 study was conducted at 2 sister hospitals within the same university, 25 and 1 study spanned multiple medical centers in the same region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With handoff training and a 22-item checklist, Jullia et al 20 reported that the mean information transfer scores improved by 43% in the intervention group. Similarly, Lee et al 28 reported that information items spontaneously relayed increased from 54% to 98% with an electronic handover checklist and tutorial.…”
Section: Effects Of Handoff Tools On Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Information Transfer. Three of the 6 studies reported on information transfer, 10,20,28 related to the verbal relay of information from an outgoing clinician to incoming clinician during handoff. For example, Agarwala et al 10 described improvements with regard to discussion of intraoperative medications and fluid balance and improved item recall with their checklist.…”
Section: Effects Of Handoff Tools On Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies were singlesite. 10,[26][27][28] Five studies were conducted at academic medical centers, 10,20,[26][27][28] with the exception of 1 study that included participants from both academic and nonacademic sites. 29 All studies were published in the last decade (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019).…”
Section: Prospective Studies Of Intraoperative Handoff Toolsmentioning
Intraoperative handoffs between anesthesia clinicians are critical for care continuity. However, such handoffs pose a significant threat to patient safety. This systematic review synthesizes the empirical evidence on the (a) effect of intraoperative handoffs on outcomes and (b) effect of intraoperative handoff tools on outcomes. All studies on intraoperative handoffs and handoff tools published until September 2019, in any study setting and population, and with no prespecified criteria on the type of comparison and outcome were included. Data extracted from the included studies were aggregated to identify common patterns related to the type of surgery, clinician(s) involved, patient population, handoff tool, the tool design approach (where relevant), tool implementation strategies, and finally, all reported clinical and process outcomes. Quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies used adult patients. Eight studies were retrospective cohort studies that used administrative or electronic health record (EHR)–based databases to investigate the effects of intraoperative handoffs on morbidity and mortality. These studies included a total of 680,855 surgeries, with 139,426 of these surgeries having at least 1 handoff (20.47%). Seven of the studies found a positive association between intraoperative handoffs and considered outcomes. However, a pooled meta-analysis across these studies was not feasible across the retrospective studies due to differing surgical populations and varying definitions of the considered outcomes. Six studies used a nonrandomized prospective design to evaluate the effects of handoff tools on process-based outcomes such as clinician satisfaction, information transfer, handoff duration, and adherence. Five of the 6 handoff tools were checklist based. All prospective tool-based studies relied on small samples and reported a significant improvement on the considered process-based outcomes. The median quality score among retrospective (median [interquartile range {IQR}] = 9 [1]) was significantly higher than that of prospective (median [IQR] = 5 [1.5]) studies (U = 21, P = .0017). This systematic review provides a unique appraisal of the current state of intraoperative handoff research. To improve the quality and outcomes of handoffs, future efforts should focus on design and implementation of standardized handoff tools integrated within EHR systems, consider the use of similar metrics for evaluating handoff process and clinical outcomes, and improve the execution and reporting of studies using standard protocols and guidelines.
“…26–28 Three studies were described as quality improvement projects 10,26,29 (Table 3). All prospective studies used a prepost design––3 studies included a matched control, 26,28,29 2 studies did not have a matched control, 10,20 and Jayaswal et al 27 did not report on the details of their control arm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,11,12,18,19,[23][24][25] Six studies used a nonrandomized prospective design to evaluate the effects of specific handoff tools on process-based outcomes such as clinician satisfaction with tool use, effectiveness of information transfer using the tool, and tool satisfaction (see section Prospective Studies of Intraoperative Handoff Tools). 10,20,[26][27][28][29] Retrospective Cohort Studies of Intraoperative Handoffs These studies included a total of 680,855 surgeries with 139,426 of these having at least 1 handoff (20.47%). Most of the included retrospective studies (n = 6 of 8) were conducted at a single academic medical center 11,12,18,19,23,24 ; 1 study was conducted at 2 sister hospitals within the same university, 25 and 1 study spanned multiple medical centers in the same region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With handoff training and a 22-item checklist, Jullia et al 20 reported that the mean information transfer scores improved by 43% in the intervention group. Similarly, Lee et al 28 reported that information items spontaneously relayed increased from 54% to 98% with an electronic handover checklist and tutorial.…”
Section: Effects Of Handoff Tools On Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Information Transfer. Three of the 6 studies reported on information transfer, 10,20,28 related to the verbal relay of information from an outgoing clinician to incoming clinician during handoff. For example, Agarwala et al 10 described improvements with regard to discussion of intraoperative medications and fluid balance and improved item recall with their checklist.…”
Section: Effects Of Handoff Tools On Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four studies were singlesite. 10,[26][27][28] Five studies were conducted at academic medical centers, 10,20,[26][27][28] with the exception of 1 study that included participants from both academic and nonacademic sites. 29 All studies were published in the last decade (2011)(2012)(2013)(2014)(2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019).…”
Section: Prospective Studies Of Intraoperative Handoff Toolsmentioning
Intraoperative handoffs between anesthesia clinicians are critical for care continuity. However, such handoffs pose a significant threat to patient safety. This systematic review synthesizes the empirical evidence on the (a) effect of intraoperative handoffs on outcomes and (b) effect of intraoperative handoff tools on outcomes. All studies on intraoperative handoffs and handoff tools published until September 2019, in any study setting and population, and with no prespecified criteria on the type of comparison and outcome were included. Data extracted from the included studies were aggregated to identify common patterns related to the type of surgery, clinician(s) involved, patient population, handoff tool, the tool design approach (where relevant), tool implementation strategies, and finally, all reported clinical and process outcomes. Quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Fourteen studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies used adult patients. Eight studies were retrospective cohort studies that used administrative or electronic health record (EHR)–based databases to investigate the effects of intraoperative handoffs on morbidity and mortality. These studies included a total of 680,855 surgeries, with 139,426 of these surgeries having at least 1 handoff (20.47%). Seven of the studies found a positive association between intraoperative handoffs and considered outcomes. However, a pooled meta-analysis across these studies was not feasible across the retrospective studies due to differing surgical populations and varying definitions of the considered outcomes. Six studies used a nonrandomized prospective design to evaluate the effects of handoff tools on process-based outcomes such as clinician satisfaction, information transfer, handoff duration, and adherence. Five of the 6 handoff tools were checklist based. All prospective tool-based studies relied on small samples and reported a significant improvement on the considered process-based outcomes. The median quality score among retrospective (median [interquartile range {IQR}] = 9 [1]) was significantly higher than that of prospective (median [IQR] = 5 [1.5]) studies (U = 21, P = .0017). This systematic review provides a unique appraisal of the current state of intraoperative handoff research. To improve the quality and outcomes of handoffs, future efforts should focus on design and implementation of standardized handoff tools integrated within EHR systems, consider the use of similar metrics for evaluating handoff process and clinical outcomes, and improve the execution and reporting of studies using standard protocols and guidelines.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.