1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0921-4526(97)00086-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic specific heat of Ti1+xS2 (0 < x < 0.1)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the lattice parameter a decreases firstly from 3.4077 Å to 3.3998 Å as the cobalt content x increases from 0 to 0.20, and then a increases to 3.4067 Å for x = 0.30. Many investigations [25][26][27][28] have shown that the lattice parameter a of the intercalated compounds M y TiS 2 (where M stands for intercalated elements) is always found to increase with increasing content of intercalated elements. (For example, the lattice parameter a changed from 3.4083 Å to 3.4156 Å in Bi y TiS 2 25 with y increasing from 0 to 0.25; the parameter a of Li y TiS 2 27 changed from 3.407 Å to 3.452 Å with increasing y from 0 to 1.0; the parameter a of self-intercalated compound Ti 1+y S 2 28 increased from 3.405 Å to 3.412 Å with y increasing from 0 to 0.1; see Table I.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the lattice parameter a decreases firstly from 3.4077 Å to 3.3998 Å as the cobalt content x increases from 0 to 0.20, and then a increases to 3.4067 Å for x = 0.30. Many investigations [25][26][27][28] have shown that the lattice parameter a of the intercalated compounds M y TiS 2 (where M stands for intercalated elements) is always found to increase with increasing content of intercalated elements. (For example, the lattice parameter a changed from 3.4083 Å to 3.4156 Å in Bi y TiS 2 25 with y increasing from 0 to 0.25; the parameter a of Li y TiS 2 27 changed from 3.407 Å to 3.452 Å with increasing y from 0 to 1.0; the parameter a of self-intercalated compound Ti 1+y S 2 28 increased from 3.405 Å to 3.412 Å with y increasing from 0 to 0.1; see Table I.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 However, in practice, self-intercalation of Ti into TiS 2 is unavoidable in the synthesis process. 28 As a result, TiS 2 almost always appears as an extrinsic semiconductor. Moreover, if the ionization energy of self-intercalated Ti atoms is small enough, complete ionization will occur at the low temperatures that can normally be reached.…”
Section: Effects Of Co Doping On DC Resistivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accurate lattice parameters were determined from the d values of the XRD peaks using a standard least-squares refinement method with a Si standard for calibration. Many investigations [26][27][28] showed that lattice parameter a of the intercalated compounds M y TiS 2 ͑here M stands for intercalated elements͒ was always found to increase with increasing content of intercalated elements ͑for example, lattice parameter a changed from 3.4083 to 3.4156 Å in Bi y TiS 2 ͑Ref. One can see from Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the TiS 2 layer is weakly stacked through van der Waals forces, the excess Ti atoms occupy the space between TiS 2 layers. The lattice parameter a monotonically increases from 0.3405 nm for Ti 1.001 S 2 to 0.3412 nm for Ti 1.093 S 2 , and c increases from 0.5691 nm for Ti 1.001 S 2 to 0.5711 nm for Ti 1.093 S 2 [70]. …”
Section: Tis2-based Layered Sulfidesmentioning
confidence: 99%