2018
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra00635k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic properties of atomically thin MoS2 layers grown by physical vapour deposition: band structure and energy level alignment at layer/substrate interfaces

Abstract: We present an analysis of the electronic properties of an MoS 2 monolayer (ML) and bilayer (BL) as-grown on a highly ordered pyrolytic graphite (HOPG) substrate by physical vapour deposition (PVD), using lab-based angle-resolved photoemission spectroscopy (ARPES) supported by scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) for morphology and elemental assessments, respectively. Despite the presence of multiple domains (causing in-plane rotational disorder) and structural defects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

8
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(67 reference statements)
8
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The peaks at 230.1 eV (162.9 eV) and 233.2 eV (164.1 eV) in pristine ML (Figure a,d) can be attributed to the Mo 3d 5/2 (S 2p 3/2 ) and Mo 3d 3/2 (S 2p 1/2 ) spin–orbit components, respectively, in good agreement with reported binding energies in MoS 2 layers. , In the Mo 3d region, the S 2s core level (227.2 eV) is also clearly resolved. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The peaks at 230.1 eV (162.9 eV) and 233.2 eV (164.1 eV) in pristine ML (Figure a,d) can be attributed to the Mo 3d 5/2 (S 2p 3/2 ) and Mo 3d 3/2 (S 2p 1/2 ) spin–orbit components, respectively, in good agreement with reported binding energies in MoS 2 layers. , In the Mo 3d region, the S 2s core level (227.2 eV) is also clearly resolved. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In order to fully simulate the Mo 3d spectra of sputtered ML, an additional low binding energy doublet needs to be introduced (Figure b) at ∼0.9 eV from the main Mo 3d components. Comparable energy separations were reported in previous XPS measurements on MoS 2 layers and the low binding energy Mo 3d doublet attributed to undercoordinated Mo atoms in a substoichiometric MoS 2– x phase, originating from S-vacancies. , …”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 74%
“…However, the effect is so small that it has a negligible influence on the g factor [53]. In TMD HB such calculations also show highly spin polarized band edge states at the K points [54]. Therefore, taking n,±K = ±1 for those states is indeed a reasonable approximation.…”
Section: A Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Systems and The Impact Of Optical Selection Rules On G Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…mm 2 range), which is still challenging for TMDC monolayers and thus limits obtaining the desired information on the electronic band structure for many interesting systems. Specifically, TMDC monolayers fabricated by various methods generally comprise flakes (typical lengths ranging from a few 10 nm to several 10 µm) with azimuthal (φ) disorder, i.e., samples are two-dimensional (2D) powders [16][17][18][19][20] . Accordingly, the electronic band dispersion of each azimuthally rotated flakes contributes to the ARPES spectra, generally prohibiting band dispersion observation due to the angular averaging.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%