2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4612-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic physician notifications to improve guideline-based anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02950285.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Expert decisional support may have greater traction in the current post-DOAC era as DOACs may be an "easier sell" if GPs are more pre-disposed to using these drugs over warfarin. However, our results are consistent with several randomised and non-randomised evaluations of implementation strategies for reducing stroke risk in AF which mainly report null findings or small differences in the uptake of anticoagulants in the pre and post-DOAC era [32,[36][37][38][39]. Taken together, these findings indicate that shifting prescribing practice remains challenging.…”
Section: Implications For Current Practicesupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Expert decisional support may have greater traction in the current post-DOAC era as DOACs may be an "easier sell" if GPs are more pre-disposed to using these drugs over warfarin. However, our results are consistent with several randomised and non-randomised evaluations of implementation strategies for reducing stroke risk in AF which mainly report null findings or small differences in the uptake of anticoagulants in the pre and post-DOAC era [32,[36][37][38][39]. Taken together, these findings indicate that shifting prescribing practice remains challenging.…”
Section: Implications For Current Practicesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…A recent study reported a small (3%) but significant increase in anticoagulant prescribing attributable to a computerised decision support tool activated during interactions between physicians and patients [34], consistent with results from an earlier study employing a computerised risk assessment tool to guide real-time decision making [35]. In contrast, another recent study found no effect of an intervention using email notifications reporting patient-specific stroke risk and guideline recommendations for antithrombotic treatment [36]. Evidence from other randomised and non-randomised trials suggests simply having access to support tools, such as risk calculators, electronically generated feedback reports and automated prompts in anticipation of patient visits does not impact prescribing rates [37][38][39].…”
Section: Comparison With Other Studiessupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) is concentrated in older adults—80% of adults with AF are 65 years and older, many with comorbid conditions that affect functioning and quality of life 1,2 . Whereas clinical guidelines recommend clinicians focus primarily on ischemic stroke risk when considering anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis, physicians report that geriatric syndromes are important when considering anticoagulants for older adults 3‐8 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of reminders such as emails, faculty meetings, and webinars to increase provider adherence to clinical guidelines was previously shown to have variable results. In 2018, Ashburner et al 17 concluded that the email reminders with specific patient information and educational materials, including clinical guidelines, did not increase rates of appropriate anticoagulation prescribing for those at increased stroke risk. On the other hand, active engagement of physicians through “continuing medical education and multifaceted interventions were found to be the most effective methods for implementing guidelines into general practice.” 18 In this QI initiative, we actively engaged frontline providers throughout the process with ongoing education, ongoing reminders, and an MOC opportunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%