Electronic monitoring devices and data processing

Punitiveness of electronic monitoring: Perception and experience of an alternative sanction

“…The articles primarily focus on subjects such as recidivism (Anderson and Telle, 2019;Gable, 2007;Marklund and Holmberg, 2009) and compliance (Hucklesby, 2009); political trends and uses (in single countries or jurisdictions) (Beyens, 2017;Boone et al, 2017;Campello, 2017;Haverkamp and Woessner, 2016;Kensey et al, 2010;Laurie and Maglione, 2020;Nellis, 2005); costs and benefits of EM (Belur et al, 2020;Omori and Turner, 2015;Sukhodolov et al, 2017;Yang, 2017); the problem of net-widening (Kantorowicz-Reznichenko, 2015); social, economic, psychological and educational effects on offenders (Andersen and Andersen, 2014;Deuchar, 2012;Fallesen and Andersen, 2017;Schwedler and Woessner, 2017) and non-offenders' attitudes towards EM (Furnham et al, 2010;Hucklesby, 2011;Shahbazov, 2019). Meanwhile, some articles focus on technological development (Spalevic et al, 2016), privatizing trends in justice sanctions (Nellis, 2014;Paterson, 2007), issues of space and time relating to EM (Devresse, 2012a) and the ways EM affects an offender's environment (Devresse, 2012b). Some of these articles concentrate on offenders with specific offences such as sexual offences, domestic violence (Erez and Ibarra, 2007), driving under the influence or, more generally, serious crimes and misdemeanours.…”