1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf00040993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic excitation transfer in the photosynthetic unit: Reflections on work of William Arnold

Abstract: Among his many contributions to photosynthesis, William Arnold made critical suggestions about the mechanism of the initial stages of excitation energy transfer and its measurement. Thus he helped found not only the general concept of the photosynthetic unit but also the key idea behind the detailed functional aspects of its 'chlorophyll antenna'. We review the development of these ideas and the modern form in which they have emerged.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Several theoretical models predict, however, that in cases where the coupling between chromophores is strong, the Förster model is inadequate. [2][3][4] Historically, the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex (FMO) has provided a convenient model system for studies of energy transfer in photosynthesis where the classical Förster model breaks down. 4,5 Like most photosynthetic antennae, FMO consists of an array of chromophores embedded within a protein scaffold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Several theoretical models predict, however, that in cases where the coupling between chromophores is strong, the Förster model is inadequate. [2][3][4] Historically, the Fenna-Matthews-Olson complex (FMO) has provided a convenient model system for studies of energy transfer in photosynthesis where the classical Förster model breaks down. 4,5 Like most photosynthetic antennae, FMO consists of an array of chromophores embedded within a protein scaffold.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A more complete description of this connection is found in Ref. 12. On a personal note, Kenkre and I were able to tell Förster about this result in Rochester, less than a year before his untimely death in 1974.…”
Section: Strong and Weak Coupling Problemmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Oppenheimer questioned how excitation moved from phycocyanin to Chlorophyll, came up with a version of Förster's mechanism that predicted the equivalent of "R −6 transfer." The connection has to be carefully gleaned 12 from the Arnold-Oppenheimer papers. 13,14 In 1947, Förster himself considered the photosynthesis problem, 15 but results of more intensive experimental work of the 1950s…”
Section: Excitation Transfer 1930 To 1945mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] While incoherent (or hopping) dynamics has been found to be the dominant mechanism of energy transfer, it is not the only mechanism. 5 Coherent dynamics involves ballistic energy flow between sites. It has been suggested that energy transfer is characterized by interplay of the two regimes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that energy transfer is characterized by interplay of the two regimes. 5,6 The microscopic distinction between the regimes arises from how the bath interacts with the electronic states. While fourwave mixing experiments had been employed to understand coherent and incoherent nuclear motion and energy transfer dynamics in biological systems, 7,8 the development of twodimensional electronic spectroscopy (2DES) has facilitated detailed analysis of four-wave mixing signals by resolving absorption and emission frequencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%