2012
DOI: 10.1117/1.jbo.17.1.011003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Förster’s resonance excitation transfer theory: not just a formula

Abstract: Abstract. After 65 years of increasing scrutiny and application, Theodor Förster's treatment of resonance excitation transfer is widely quoted and has acquired the acronym FRET, in which "F" originally and rather curiously stood for "fluorescence." In this brief and mostly qualitative survey, we review some of its history, mention its important limitations, and relate some personal encounters with Förster.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3C) suggested a much smaller overlap with the near-perpendicular reciprocal orientations of dyes suggesting lower probability of close inter-dye interactions. This dye orientation also suggests near-perpendicular orientation of transition dipole moments of the cyanine donor and acceptor at the equilibrium that results in low values of orienation κ 2 factor 26 corresponding to near-zero FRET efficiency 27 (Fig. 3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…3C) suggested a much smaller overlap with the near-perpendicular reciprocal orientations of dyes suggesting lower probability of close inter-dye interactions. This dye orientation also suggests near-perpendicular orientation of transition dipole moments of the cyanine donor and acceptor at the equilibrium that results in low values of orienation κ 2 factor 26 corresponding to near-zero FRET efficiency 27 (Fig. 3C).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…FRET between fluorophores requires that (1) the emission spectrum of the donor must overlap the excitation spectrum of the acceptor; (2) the transition dipoles of the two molecules be in a favorable (i.e, nonorthogonal) orientation; and (3) the two molecules be in very close spatial proximity (Foerster, 1946; Knox, 2012; Pietraszewska-Bogiel & Gadella, 2011; Sun et al, 2011). The hallmark of FRET is that when the sample is illuminated at the excitation wavelength of the donor, emission from the acceptor is detected and occurs concomitant with a decrease in the emission of the donor.…”
Section: Protein Preparation and Labelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, unlike assembly of F-actin from monomeric G-actin, or assembly of microtubules from α-β tubulin dimers, formation of higher-order septin-based structures involves the assembly of a building block that has a very elongated geometry (4 × 32 nm). Given the linear organization and extended shape of septin heterooctamers, the method in fluorescence spectrometry that should be ideal for assessing their interactions is Förster resonance energy transfer (FRET) (Foerster, 1946; Knox, 2012; Pietraszewska-Bogiel & Gadella, 2011; Sun, Wallrabe, Seo, & Periasamy, 2011). To assess protein–protein interaction using FRET, one set of molecules is labeled with a donor fluorophore at a defined position that is not rotationally constrained and mixed with another set of molecules labeled with an acceptor fluorophore, also at a defined position that is not rotationally constrained.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…InĤ − , the individual anti-correlated motions add up according to Eq. (25) to give rise to the generalized anti-correlated tuning vector…”
Section: Correlated and Anti-correlated Delocalized Vibrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of vibrational-electronic resonance on the excited state leads to eigenfunctions with rapidly changing electronic character over the whole range of anti-correlated vibrational coordinates. This breakdown of the Born-Oppenheimer approximation 24 over the whole range of vibrational coordinates renders the adiabatic framework, under which electronic energy transfer has been traditionally studied (in both the adiabatic strong coupling and non-adiabatic weak coupling limits), 7,25 invalid. The resulting "unavoidable nested funnel" 22 is different from a conical funnel 26,27 because a finite Coulomb coupling between two pigments does not allow an energetically accessible intersection between their excited state adiabatic potential energy surfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%