2018
DOI: 10.1109/ted.2017.2776612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic Conduction Mechanisms in Insulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The fitting result suggests that Schottky emission is the dominant mechanism; this is mainly determined by the interface between the HfAlO x and the TiN bottom electrode. Although electroforming occurs under a negative bias, since a sufficient number of defects were not formed inside the HfAlO x dielectric, the conduction can be determined by the interface according to the difference in work function between the TiN electrode and HfAlO x layer [38]. On the other hand, for BRS, Ohmic conduction is dominant under linear fitting for ln(I) versus ln(V) with a slope of about 1 in the on-state under a positive bias, as shown in the inset of Figure 4b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fitting result suggests that Schottky emission is the dominant mechanism; this is mainly determined by the interface between the HfAlO x and the TiN bottom electrode. Although electroforming occurs under a negative bias, since a sufficient number of defects were not formed inside the HfAlO x dielectric, the conduction can be determined by the interface according to the difference in work function between the TiN electrode and HfAlO x layer [38]. On the other hand, for BRS, Ohmic conduction is dominant under linear fitting for ln(I) versus ln(V) with a slope of about 1 in the on-state under a positive bias, as shown in the inset of Figure 4b.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evidenced by the rise in the electrical conductivity to the order of 10 4 for 2% Mn 2+ doped CdSe over undoped one as shown in Figure 11(a) [17]. Here, the conduction mechanism is controlled by the electric field-assisted thermal ionization of trapped charge carriers in CdSe QDs as described in Poole-Frenkel effect as shown in Figure 11(b) [66]. The bandgap has no role in the conductivity and the observed colossal conductivity enhancement is solely due to the concentration of Mn 2+ dopant ions.…”
Section: Electrical and Memristor Property Of Mn 2+ Doped Cdse Qdsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…There are many factors that go into device switching at each temperature for the SDC device. Some examples include the temperature dependence of the chemical reaction between Ag or Cu and the SnSe layer and induced reactions in the active layer; movement of mobile ions through a variable-stiffness glass network; constricted channel for ion motion (e.g., due to cold temperature volume contractions); and the typical DC conductivity mechanistic concerns (e.g., Fermi energy level and dominant electron conduction mechanism at each temperature [42,43,44]). It could also be reasoned that even programming a set of devices to a state value, and then subjecting the devices to a set of varying temperatures and measuring conductivity could also confound the mechanism analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%