1999
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.59.5688
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Electronic and optical properties of strained quantum dots modeled by 8-band k⋅p theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

37
766
5
7

Year Published

1999
1999
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,069 publications
(815 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
37
766
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, we are not considering tunneling of states, which have a lower energy than the conduction-band edge of the ''barrier'' material, as in vertically coupled dots, but tunneling at energies that are lower energy than those of isolated WL states, but still lie well above the conduction-band edge. A third and crucial difference is that here we are not discussing the coupling of the ground state, but of the excited states, whose lateral extent is typically between 1.5 and 2 times that of the ground state, 20,30 and was recently calculated to be about 66% more extended in isolated InAs/ InP QDs grown on a ͑311͒B substrate. 31 We can also compare the wave-function penetration in the two cases.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, we are not considering tunneling of states, which have a lower energy than the conduction-band edge of the ''barrier'' material, as in vertically coupled dots, but tunneling at energies that are lower energy than those of isolated WL states, but still lie well above the conduction-band edge. A third and crucial difference is that here we are not discussing the coupling of the ground state, but of the excited states, whose lateral extent is typically between 1.5 and 2 times that of the ground state, 20,30 and was recently calculated to be about 66% more extended in isolated InAs/ InP QDs grown on a ͑311͒B substrate. 31 We can also compare the wave-function penetration in the two cases.…”
Section: B Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the computational complexity of the pseudopotential methods that take into account the atomistic nature of the structure, one often employs the k · p method which is considered to be a reliable tool for modeling the electronic structure of quantum dots despite its known limitations 8 . The symmetry of the k · p model itself is the symmetry group of the zincblende crystal lattice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pyramid shape symmetry group is a subgroup of the symmetry of the zincblende crystal lattice, it follows that the symmetry group of the model is the double C 4 group 17 . Two different approaches are used to calculate the strain distribution in quantum dots -the continuum mechanical 8,11 and the valence force field model 8,10 . When the strain distribution is incorporated in the k · p method, the continuum mechanical model preserves the C 4 symmetry, while the valence force field model, due to its atomistic nature, breaks it 8,10 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Piezoelectric potentials, however, caused by shear strain from the lattice mismatch between InAs and GaAs, tend to elongate the hole in the ͓110͔ direction, and the electron in the ͓110͔ direction. 24 Thus for strongly confined states, shear strain tends to also elongate the exciton in the ͓110͔ direction, since the extent of the exciton wave function is dominated by the small hole. However, as confinement is reduced, shape asymmetry becomes less dominant as the electron and hole states extend into the barrier, and the relative size and elongation of the electron and hole states could potentially lead to an exciton state elongated along ͓110͔, the preferred axis of expansion for the electron.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%